Establishing ethical design principles for ‘Humanised’ generative AI workplace coaches

The purpose of this conceptual paper is to explore the design principles which can be used to inform the design and deployment of AI coaching agents, an area of growing interest and activity. The paper draws on coaching psychology, AI ethics and empirical studies of AI coaching to offer seven design principles: (i) transparency and informed continuous consent, (ii) autonomy and user empowerment, (iii) privacy and data protection, (iv) fairness, (v) do no harm and beneficence, (vi) accountability and (vii) alignment. Further it argues that generative AI tools should be viewed not as agency free but as more akin to a domesticated pet and that liability for unintended negative events, such as harm to a person, should be shared between the designers, the IP holders and the AI agent. The paper aims to inform this emerging agenda for designers, organisational buyers and coaching psychologists who are considering or deploying AI workplace coaching agents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Coaching Psychologist
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2025.21.1.48
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing ethical design principles for ‘Humanised’ generative AI workplace coaches

Jazz Rasool, Tara A. Wilson, Bergsveinn Olafsson, Jonathan Passmore
The Coaching Psychologist
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Establishing ethical design principles for ‘Humanised’ generative AI workplace coaches

Jazz Rasool, Tara A. Wilson, Bergsveinn Olafsson, Jonathan Passmore
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this conceptual paper is to explore the design principles which can be used to inform the design and deployment of AI coaching agents, an area of growing interest and activity. The paper draws on coaching psychology, AI ethics and empirical studies of AI coaching to offer seven design principles: (i) transparency and informed continuous consent, (ii) autonomy and user empowerment, (iii) privacy and data protection, (iv) fairness, (v) do no harm and beneficence, (vi) accountability and (vii) alignment. Further it argues that generative AI tools should be viewed not as agency free but as more akin to a domesticated pet and that liability for unintended negative events, such as harm to a person, should be shared between the designers, the IP holders and the AI agent. The paper aims to inform this emerging agenda for designers, organisational buyers and coaching psychologists who are considering or deploying AI workplace coaching agents.

The Coaching PsychologistVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Establishing ethical design principles for ‘Humanised’ generative AI workplace coaches — Jazz Rasool, Tara A. Wilson, et al. · The Coaching Psychologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS