Explainable machine learning for predicting compressive strength of rubberized concrete: SHAP interpretation, lifecycle assessment, and design recommendations

The study explores dataset preparation, machine learning (ML) model training, interpretation, and life cycle assessment (LCA) to predict and enhance the performance and sustainability of rubberized concrete. A large dataset comprising 1209 collected samples with nine input features was used to train and evaluate six machine learning models. Among the six models, the Light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model achieved the highest prediction accuracy on the testing dataset, with an R 2 value exceeding 0.96, a MAPE of 8.31 %, a MAE of 2.36 MPa, and a RMSE of 3.25 MPa. The SHAP algorithm was used to interpret predictions and identify key factors influencing compressive strength. Rubber content and water-to-cement ratio reduced strength, while longer curing time, more superplasticizer, higher fine aggregate content, and a greater silica fume-to-cement ratio improved it. Coarse aggregate, crumb rubber size, and cement content had minimal impact. Optimal performance was achieved with: Rubber content <55.92 kg/m 3 , w/c ratio <0.4, curing time >26 days, superplasticizer >3.7 kg/m 3 , fine aggregate >642 kg/m 3 , and silica fume/cement ratio >2.5 %. LCA results show that, although rubberized concrete offers no clear advantage over conventional concrete in cost, carbon, or energy, the lower strength and higher superplasticizer use of rubberized concrete lead to greater strength-normalized impacts, and therefore its value lies more in waste recycling and toughness than in strength-based sustainability. The unique advantage of this research lies in the development of a ML-LCA integration framework that synthetically balances performance prediction and sustainability assessment of rubberized concrete, with delivering actionable mix design recommendations, identifying key and low-impact variables, and revealing trade-offs among strength, cost, and environmental performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147338
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable machine learning for predicting compressive strength of rubberized concrete: SHAP interpretation, lifecycle assessment, and design recommendations

Soroush Mahjoubi, Xiao Tan, Haotian Qiu, Pengwei Guo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
article

Explainable machine learning for predicting compressive strength of rubberized concrete: SHAP interpretation, lifecycle assessment, and design recommendations

Soroush Mahjoubi, Xiao Tan, Haotian Qiu, Pengwei Guo, Yuan Wang, Jianglei Xing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study explores dataset preparation, machine learning (ML) model training, interpretation, and life cycle assessment (LCA) to predict and enhance the performance and sustainability of rubberized concrete. A large dataset comprising 1209 collected samples with nine input features was used to train and evaluate six machine learning models. Among the six models, the Light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model achieved the highest prediction accuracy on the testing dataset, with an R 2 value exceeding 0.96, a MAPE of 8.31 %, a MAE of 2.36 MPa, and a RMSE of 3.25 MPa. The SHAP algorithm was used to interpret predictions and identify key factors influencing compressive strength. Rubber content and water-to-cement ratio reduced strength, while longer curing time, more superplasticizer, higher fine aggregate content, and a greater silica fume-to-cement ratio improved it. Coarse aggregate, crumb rubber size, and cement content had minimal impact. Optimal performance was achieved with: Rubber content <55.92 kg/m 3 , w/c ratio <0.4, curing time >26 days, superplasticizer >3.7 kg/m 3 , fine aggregate >642 kg/m 3 , and silica fume/cement ratio >2.5 %. LCA results show that, although rubberized concrete offers no clear advantage over conventional concrete in cost, carbon, or energy, the lower strength and higher superplasticizer use of rubberized concrete lead to greater strength-normalized impacts, and therefore its value lies more in waste recycling and toughness than in strength-based sustainability. The unique advantage of this research lies in the development of a ML-LCA integration framework that synthetically balances performance prediction and sustainability assessment of rubberized concrete, with delivering actionable mix design recommendations, identifying key and low-impact variables, and revealing trade-offs among strength, cost, and environmental performance.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 538
Hohai University (CN), Institute of Disaster Prevention (CN), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.