Competency Expectations for Sensing Technologies in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study of Academia and Industry Perceptions

Sensing technologies are integral to the construction industry, enabling precise data collection, monitoring, and analysis for activities such as quality control, resource tracking, and progress monitoring. Despite their transformative potential, the adoption of these technologies is hindered by a persistent competency gap stemming from misalignment between academic curricula and industry expectations. This study addresses this gap by comparing the perspectives of academia and industry practitioners in the United States on the competencies (knowledge, skills, and abilities) required for implementing sensing technologies. Using a three-round Delphi study, this study engages academic representatives from accredited higher education institutions and industry practitioners from the US construction sector. Findings indicate a broad consensus between academia and industry on the importance of core competencies, including sensing technology operation, deployment relative to construction site conditions, and information modeling. Notably, areas of divergence include ethics and regulatory knowledge, research and development, and sensor signal processing techniques, reflecting differing priorities: academia emphasizes foundational research and ethical considerations, while industry focuses on hands-on, application-oriented competencies. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying key areas of alignment and divergence, offering insights for curriculum development and workforce training. The results emphasize the need for integrated academic programs that address shared priorities while fostering academia–industry collaboration to bridge divergent priorities. By aligning academic training with industry needs, these findings can enhance workforce readiness, advance the adoption of sensing technologies, and drive innovation in the construction industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-2041
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competency Expectations for Sensing Technologies in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study of Academia and Industry Perceptions

Abiola Akanmu, Abiola Adegoke, Nnaji Chukwuma, Yewande Abraham
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Competency Expectations for Sensing Technologies in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study of Academia and Industry Perceptions

Abiola Akanmu, Abiola Adegoke, Nnaji Chukwuma, Yewande Abraham
article en

Abstract

Sensing technologies are integral to the construction industry, enabling precise data collection, monitoring, and analysis for activities such as quality control, resource tracking, and progress monitoring. Despite their transformative potential, the adoption of these technologies is hindered by a persistent competency gap stemming from misalignment between academic curricula and industry expectations. This study addresses this gap by comparing the perspectives of academia and industry practitioners in the United States on the competencies (knowledge, skills, and abilities) required for implementing sensing technologies. Using a three-round Delphi study, this study engages academic representatives from accredited higher education institutions and industry practitioners from the US construction sector. Findings indicate a broad consensus between academia and industry on the importance of core competencies, including sensing technology operation, deployment relative to construction site conditions, and information modeling. Notably, areas of divergence include ethics and regulatory knowledge, research and development, and sensor signal processing techniques, reflecting differing priorities: academia emphasizes foundational research and ethical considerations, while industry focuses on hands-on, application-oriented competencies. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying key areas of alignment and divergence, offering insights for curriculum development and workforce training. The results emphasize the need for integrated academic programs that address shared priorities while fostering academia–industry collaboration to bridge divergent priorities. By aligning academic training with industry needs, these findings can enhance workforce readiness, advance the adoption of sensing technologies, and drive innovation in the construction industry.

Journal of Architectural EngineeringVol. 32(1)
Mitchell Institute (US), Virginia Tech (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.