Psychometric evaluation of the culture around systemic change survey: A tool for assessing facets of departmental culture in physics

Physics programs are continually evolving to better support student learning and meet the diverse needs of their students. Achieving many of these goals requires not only structural adjustments but also fundamental shifts in departmental culture. Recognizing this, disciplinary organizations in physics have placed systemic change and equity at the center of reform efforts, identifying them as essential pillars of meaningful and sustainable change. Yet, tools for assessing departmental culture around educational change remain limited. In this study, we introduce the (CSCS), designed to assess departmental culture around pursuing any program-level change (undergraduate and/or graduate) aimed at improving student experience or outcomes (e.g., curriculum revisions, instructional practices, and efforts to strengthen departmental climate). This new instrument measures faculty and staff perceptions of their department’s “current” and “ideal” states with respect to their typical approaches to leading change efforts. Using responses from the “current” scale only ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>N</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>111</a:mn> </a:math> participants across 33 departments), we conducted a psychometric evaluation of the CSCS. Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure, including open-mindedness (OM), student involvement (SI), collective interpretation of evidence (CIE), sustainability (S), and disruption of systemic injustices (DSI). As survey development is an iterative process, future work will focus on refinement and confirmatory analysis. This work sets the foundation for conducting population studies that assess the state of progress of the physics community along an equitable and systemic culture to pursuing educational change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/mt34-y14m
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric evaluation of the culture around systemic change survey: A tool for assessing facets of departmental culture in physics

Jayna Petrella, Anonymous, Mike Verostek, Chandra Turpen
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Psychometric evaluation of the culture around systemic change survey: A tool for assessing facets of departmental culture in physics

Jayna Petrella, Anonymous, Mike Verostek, Chandra Turpen
article en

Abstract

Physics programs are continually evolving to better support student learning and meet the diverse needs of their students. Achieving many of these goals requires not only structural adjustments but also fundamental shifts in departmental culture. Recognizing this, disciplinary organizations in physics have placed systemic change and equity at the center of reform efforts, identifying them as essential pillars of meaningful and sustainable change. Yet, tools for assessing departmental culture around educational change remain limited. In this study, we introduce the (CSCS), designed to assess departmental culture around pursuing any program-level change (undergraduate and/or graduate) aimed at improving student experience or outcomes (e.g., curriculum revisions, instructional practices, and efforts to strengthen departmental climate). This new instrument measures faculty and staff perceptions of their department’s “current” and “ideal” states with respect to their typical approaches to leading change efforts. Using responses from the “current” scale only ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>N</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>111</a:mn> </a:math> participants across 33 departments), we conducted a psychometric evaluation of the CSCS. Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure, including open-mindedness (OM), student involvement (SI), collective interpretation of evidence (CIE), sustainability (S), and disruption of systemic injustices (DSI). As survey development is an iterative process, future work will focus on refinement and confirmatory analysis. This work sets the foundation for conducting population studies that assess the state of progress of the physics community along an equitable and systemic culture to pursuing educational change.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 22(1)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.