Decolonisation as Departure: Interrogating the Reconstructivist Tendencies of Australian Criminology
In this article I critically analyse the recent “decolonial” turn within Australian criminology. Drawing upon critical Indigenous conceptualisations of decolonisation and analysing my personal confrontations with the discipline, I examine how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse rather than a praxis. By interrogating the discursive effects of recent calls to decolonise Australian criminology, I consider how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse to secure their own innocence and the futurity of Australian criminology. Building on the scholarship of Dylan Rodríguez (2021), I argue that the “decolonial” turn in Australian criminology is underpinned by a logic of “White Reconstruction”, which operates to reinscribe the discipline’s function as an accomplice to the state and inhibit possibilities for decolonial and abolitionist change. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of these reconstructivist tendencies for Indigenous scholars and scholars committed to decolonial and abolitionist praxis working within Australian criminology.
Authors
- Natalie Ironfield
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of global indigeneity.
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54760/001c.151795
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.20