Decolonisation as Departure: Interrogating the Reconstructivist Tendencies of Australian Criminology

In this article I critically analyse the recent “decolonial” turn within Australian criminology. Drawing upon critical Indigenous conceptualisations of decolonisation and analysing my personal confrontations with the discipline, I examine how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse rather than a praxis. By interrogating the discursive effects of recent calls to decolonise Australian criminology, I consider how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse to secure their own innocence and the futurity of Australian criminology. Building on the scholarship of Dylan Rodríguez (2021), I argue that the “decolonial” turn in Australian criminology is underpinned by a logic of “White Reconstruction”, which operates to reinscribe the discipline’s function as an accomplice to the state and inhibit possibilities for decolonial and abolitionist change. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of these reconstructivist tendencies for Indigenous scholars and scholars committed to decolonial and abolitionist praxis working within Australian criminology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of global indigeneity.
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54760/001c.151795
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonisation as Departure: Interrogating the Reconstructivist Tendencies of Australian Criminology

Natalie Ironfield
1 citations
Journal of global indigeneity.
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
article

Decolonisation as Departure: Interrogating the Reconstructivist Tendencies of Australian Criminology

Natalie Ironfield
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article I critically analyse the recent “decolonial” turn within Australian criminology. Drawing upon critical Indigenous conceptualisations of decolonisation and analysing my personal confrontations with the discipline, I examine how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse rather than a praxis. By interrogating the discursive effects of recent calls to decolonise Australian criminology, I consider how criminologists mobilise decolonisation as a discourse to secure their own innocence and the futurity of Australian criminology. Building on the scholarship of Dylan Rodríguez (2021), I argue that the “decolonial” turn in Australian criminology is underpinned by a logic of “White Reconstruction”, which operates to reinscribe the discipline’s function as an accomplice to the state and inhibit possibilities for decolonial and abolitionist change. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of these reconstructivist tendencies for Indigenous scholars and scholars committed to decolonial and abolitionist praxis working within Australian criminology.

Journal of global indigeneity.Vol. 9(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decolonisation as Departure: Interrogating the Reconstructivist Tendencies of Australian Criminology — Natalie Ironfield · Journal of global indigeneity. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS