Video Conversation Aids to Assist in Goals-Of-Care Discussions With Older Adults in a Medical Setting: A Systematic Review

BackgroundGoals-of-care (GOC) discussions align medical treatment with older adults' preferences, yet are hindered by communication barriers, provider discomfort, and misinformation. Video-based decision aids improve understanding and reduce decision conflict, though data on their use in older populations remain limited. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of video-based decision aids in improving GOC discussions and decision-making outcomes among older adults.MethodsFor this systematic review, a medical librarian conducted a literature search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Cochrane from database inception through April 2025. Eligible studies evaluated a video-based aid in US adults aged ≥65 years to facilitate GOC or code status decisions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess quality of randomized, interventional studies.ResultsOf 4438 identified studies, 7 underwent full review, and 5 met inclusion criteria. Among inpatient settings, 2 studies found video interventions significantly increased patient preference for comfort-based care, while another using a shorter video, found no effect. In outpatient settings, one study found increased preference for comfort-based care with video intervention, while another reported no preference differences. Two studies assessed knowledge; one inpatient study found no change, while an outpatient study reported greater end-of-life knowledge in the intervention group. Video variability and differences in measured outcomes limited comparisons and generalizability.ConclusionsVideo-based decision aids show promise for improving knowledge and aligning treatment preferences. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of video-based decision aids on GOC conversations in older adults in acute care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251408757
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video Conversation Aids to Assist in Goals-Of-Care Discussions With Older Adults in a Medical Setting: A Systematic Review

Thaddeus J. Puzio, Lillian S. Kao, Sonali Sanghvi, Martin L. Blakely et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Video Conversation Aids to Assist in Goals-Of-Care Discussions With Older Adults in a Medical Setting: A Systematic Review

Thaddeus J. Puzio, Lillian S. Kao, Sonali Sanghvi, Martin L. Blakely, A. Karpe, Lara Ouellette, Stephanie Martinez Ugarte, Mokunfayo O. Fajemisin, Gina H. Khraish, Jessica L. Lee, Min J. Kwak
article en

Abstract

BackgroundGoals-of-care (GOC) discussions align medical treatment with older adults' preferences, yet are hindered by communication barriers, provider discomfort, and misinformation. Video-based decision aids improve understanding and reduce decision conflict, though data on their use in older populations remain limited. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of video-based decision aids in improving GOC discussions and decision-making outcomes among older adults.MethodsFor this systematic review, a medical librarian conducted a literature search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Cochrane from database inception through April 2025. Eligible studies evaluated a video-based aid in US adults aged ≥65 years to facilitate GOC or code status decisions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess quality of randomized, interventional studies.ResultsOf 4438 identified studies, 7 underwent full review, and 5 met inclusion criteria. Among inpatient settings, 2 studies found video interventions significantly increased patient preference for comfort-based care, while another using a shorter video, found no effect. In outpatient settings, one study found increased preference for comfort-based care with video intervention, while another reported no preference differences. Two studies assessed knowledge; one inpatient study found no change, while an outpatient study reported greater end-of-life knowledge in the intervention group. Video variability and differences in measured outcomes limited comparisons and generalizability.ConclusionsVideo-based decision aids show promise for improving knowledge and aligning treatment preferences. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of video-based decision aids on GOC conversations in older adults in acute care settings.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Texas Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.