Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: Seven-Month Retrospective Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing, Large Language Model, and Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures

The LLM-based architecture (URGENTIAPARSE) demonstrated the highest accuracy for ED triage prediction among the tested models, outperforming traditional NLP, JEPA, and current nurse triage practices. However, severe overfitting, extreme selection bias (657/73,236, 0.90%, inclusion), a monocentric design, and sparse high-acuity representation limit clinical applicability. Before deployment, the model requires regularization, external validation across diverse EDs, prospective testing, and comprehensive safety evaluation, particularly for undertriage detection. Integration of AI triage support systems shows promise but demands rigorous validation, bias mitigation, and transparent uncertainty quantification to ensure patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/83318
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: Seven-Month Retrospective Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing, Large Language Model, and Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures

Édouard Lansiaux, Éric Wiel, Emmanuel Chazard, Ramy Azzouz et al.
JMIR Medical Informatics
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: Seven-Month Retrospective Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing, Large Language Model, and Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures

Édouard Lansiaux, Éric Wiel, Emmanuel Chazard, Ramy Azzouz, Amélie Vromant
article en

Abstract

The LLM-based architecture (URGENTIAPARSE) demonstrated the highest accuracy for ED triage prediction among the tested models, outperforming traditional NLP, JEPA, and current nurse triage practices. However, severe overfitting, extreme selection bias (657/73,236, 0.90%, inclusion), a monocentric design, and sparse high-acuity representation limit clinical applicability. Before deployment, the model requires regularization, external validation across diverse EDs, prospective testing, and comprehensive safety evaluation, particularly for undertriage detection. Integration of AI triage support systems shows promise but demands rigorous validation, bias mitigation, and transparent uncertainty quantification to ensure patient safety.

JMIR Medical InformaticsVol. 14
Université de Lille (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Lille’s Cardiology Hospital (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: Seven-Month Retrospective Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing, Large Language Model, and Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures — Édouard Lansiaux, Éric Wiel, et al. · JMIR Medical Informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS