An Experimental and Modeling Study on Commercial Lithium Titanate Batteries with Different Cathode Materials

This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance and modeling differences among lithium titanate oxide (LTO) batteries with three different cathode materials. An evaluation was conducted by performing performance tests over −20 °C to 25 °C at various current rates. Differences in open-circuit voltage curves, as well as charge and discharge capacities under different temperatures and C-rates, were systematically compared. At 25 °C, the NCM cathode enabled superior rate capability, retaining over 90% of its capacity at 8 C discharge, whereas the LCO-based cells exhibited significant capacity fade. Conversely, at −20 °C, the LCO cathode demonstrated better low-temperature performance, delivering almost 80% of its room-temperature capacity at 4 C, compared to less than 5% for the NCM cathode. The batteries were modeled using a second-order equivalent circuit model, and variations in model parameters were analyzed from the perspectives of internal resistance and electrode kinetics. The second-order equivalent circuit model revealed that the NCM-based cells had lower ohmic resistance and faster electrode kinetics. By correlating battery performance with cathode materials, this study evaluates the suitability of LTO batteries with different cathodes for various application scenarios, providing valuable insights for battery application and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries12010003
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Experimental and Modeling Study on Commercial Lithium Titanate Batteries with Different Cathode Materials

Hao Li
Batteries
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

An Experimental and Modeling Study on Commercial Lithium Titanate Batteries with Different Cathode Materials

Hao Li
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance and modeling differences among lithium titanate oxide (LTO) batteries with three different cathode materials. An evaluation was conducted by performing performance tests over −20 °C to 25 °C at various current rates. Differences in open-circuit voltage curves, as well as charge and discharge capacities under different temperatures and C-rates, were systematically compared. At 25 °C, the NCM cathode enabled superior rate capability, retaining over 90% of its capacity at 8 C discharge, whereas the LCO-based cells exhibited significant capacity fade. Conversely, at −20 °C, the LCO cathode demonstrated better low-temperature performance, delivering almost 80% of its room-temperature capacity at 4 C, compared to less than 5% for the NCM cathode. The batteries were modeled using a second-order equivalent circuit model, and variations in model parameters were analyzed from the perspectives of internal resistance and electrode kinetics. The second-order equivalent circuit model revealed that the NCM-based cells had lower ohmic resistance and faster electrode kinetics. By correlating battery performance with cathode materials, this study evaluates the suitability of LTO batteries with different cathodes for various application scenarios, providing valuable insights for battery application and management.

BatteriesVol. 12(1)
China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN)
China Academy of Railway Sciences
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.