Elementary Teacher Outcomes Associated with Participation in a BEST in CLASS-Elementary Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract This study employed a cluster randomized controlled trial design to investigate the impact of BEST in CLASS-Elementary, a Tier 2 intervention that trains and coaches teachers to support students with unwanted problem behavior, on teachers’ implementation of evidence-based practices, self-efficacy, burnout, and attributions for problem behavior. A total of 114 teachers (97% female; 70% White, 22% Black) and 237 focal students (71% male; 44% Black, 32% White, 8% Hispanic/Latinx) in two southeastern states participated in the study. Results indicated that compared to the comparison group, BEST in CLASS-Elementary teachers increased Adherence ( d = 0.68) and Competence ( d = 0.43) from pretest to posttest. BEST in CLASS-Elementary participants reported higher efficacy for Student Engagement ( d = 0.34), Instructional Practices ( d = 0.34), and Classroom Management ( d = 0.36). BEST in CLASS-Elementary did not produce statistically significant changes on any of the burnout or attribution scales apart from the Purposeful dimension on the attribution measure ( d = − 0.33). Findings suggest that BEST in CLASS-Elementary is effective at increasing teacher use and quality of delivery of BEST in CLASS-Elementary practices with focal students, with positive effects for teachers’ sense of self-efficacy as well as to what they attribute the purpose of focal student problem behavior. Findings, implications, and future research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Mental Health
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-025-09842-2
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elementary Teacher Outcomes Associated with Participation in a BEST in CLASS-Elementary Randomized Controlled Trial

Kristen L. Granger, Bryce D. McLeod, Kevin S. Sutherland, Michael Broda et al.
School Mental Health
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Elementary Teacher Outcomes Associated with Participation in a BEST in CLASS-Elementary Randomized Controlled Trial

Kristen L. Granger, Bryce D. McLeod, Kevin S. Sutherland, Michael Broda, Maureen Conroy, Joyce Washington, Meghan Reichel
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study employed a cluster randomized controlled trial design to investigate the impact of BEST in CLASS-Elementary, a Tier 2 intervention that trains and coaches teachers to support students with unwanted problem behavior, on teachers’ implementation of evidence-based practices, self-efficacy, burnout, and attributions for problem behavior. A total of 114 teachers (97% female; 70% White, 22% Black) and 237 focal students (71% male; 44% Black, 32% White, 8% Hispanic/Latinx) in two southeastern states participated in the study. Results indicated that compared to the comparison group, BEST in CLASS-Elementary teachers increased Adherence ( d = 0.68) and Competence ( d = 0.43) from pretest to posttest. BEST in CLASS-Elementary participants reported higher efficacy for Student Engagement ( d = 0.34), Instructional Practices ( d = 0.34), and Classroom Management ( d = 0.36). BEST in CLASS-Elementary did not produce statistically significant changes on any of the burnout or attribution scales apart from the Purposeful dimension on the attribution measure ( d = − 0.33). Findings suggest that BEST in CLASS-Elementary is effective at increasing teacher use and quality of delivery of BEST in CLASS-Elementary practices with focal students, with positive effects for teachers’ sense of self-efficacy as well as to what they attribute the purpose of focal student problem behavior. Findings, implications, and future research are discussed.

School Mental HealthVol. 18(1)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University of Florida (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.