Comparison of Digital and Traditional Methods for Occlusal Contact Assessment: An Experimental Cross-Sectional Study

This cross-sectional experimental study compared a digital intraoral-scanner-based method with a traditional wax-registration method for the quantitative assessment of static occlusal contacts. Twenty adults with natural dentition were evaluated using an intraoral scan analyzed through a Java-based software (PixCount.java, version 1.0, version 1.0, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy) and wax registration analyzed with Z_TMJ software (Z_TMJ, version 1.0, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy). The primary outcome was the percentage distribution of static occlusal contacts between hemi-arches. A paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate differences and agreement. Mean contact distribution was 49.75 ± 3.44% for the digital method and 48.02 ± 5.31% for the wax method. No statistically significant difference was observed (p > 0.05), and agreement analysis showed moderate concordance (ICC ≈ 0.43). Digital analysis provided superior visualization and workflow efficiency, whereas wax registration remained a practical, low-cost option. These findings indicate that both methods provide clinically meaningful information, with the digital approach offering additional practical advantages. The observed consistency between the two techniques supports the expanding role of digital tools in routine occlusal assessment.