The representation of SDG-related research in bibliometric databases: persisting imbalances and varying perspectives

Abstract Large bibliometric databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex, play a crucial role for decision-makers in science and science policy, as they are used as sources for informing decisions at both national and international levels, in public and private sectors. Although these databases facilitate bibliometric analyses, they are performative, affecting the visibility of scientific outputs and the measurement of participating entities. Recently, they have also incorporated the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into their respective classifications, which have been criticized for their diverging nature. On another note, their infrastructural information processing is, of course, susceptible to emerging technologies. As a matter of fact, AI-supported and -powered tools have recently entered research practice and society at large. Large Language Models (LLMs), the branch of generative AI specifically focused on text, underlie their operation. By leveraging their features (i.e., in particular, mirroring what is thoroughly embedded in their training data under certain conditions), LLMs act as data magnifiers on SDG-classified publications to detect data biases that bibliometric databases are affected by. Within a broader perspective, our general setup serves as a conceptual exercise that characterizes the expected macro-level effects on the representation of SDG-related research in bibliometric databases, originating from the introduction of a generic LLM-based tool. Our analysis shows that the deployment of LLMs in the information processing of bibliometric databases reveals a systematic overlook in the data (i.e., scientific publications classified by SDGs) of the most disadvantaged categories of individuals, the poorest countries, and underrepresented topics that SDG targets explicitly focus on. Conversely, an unsolicited hegemonic role played by economic superpowers and Global North is identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientometrics
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05857-x
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The representation of SDG-related research in bibliometric databases: persisting imbalances and varying perspectives

Stephan Stahlschmidt, Matteo Ottaviani
3 links
Scientometrics
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

The representation of SDG-related research in bibliometric databases: persisting imbalances and varying perspectives

Stephan Stahlschmidt, Matteo Ottaviani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Large bibliometric databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex, play a crucial role for decision-makers in science and science policy, as they are used as sources for informing decisions at both national and international levels, in public and private sectors. Although these databases facilitate bibliometric analyses, they are performative, affecting the visibility of scientific outputs and the measurement of participating entities. Recently, they have also incorporated the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into their respective classifications, which have been criticized for their diverging nature. On another note, their infrastructural information processing is, of course, susceptible to emerging technologies. As a matter of fact, AI-supported and -powered tools have recently entered research practice and society at large. Large Language Models (LLMs), the branch of generative AI specifically focused on text, underlie their operation. By leveraging their features (i.e., in particular, mirroring what is thoroughly embedded in their training data under certain conditions), LLMs act as data magnifiers on SDG-classified publications to detect data biases that bibliometric databases are affected by. Within a broader perspective, our general setup serves as a conceptual exercise that characterizes the expected macro-level effects on the representation of SDG-related research in bibliometric databases, originating from the introduction of a generic LLM-based tool. Our analysis shows that the deployment of LLMs in the information processing of bibliometric databases reveals a systematic overlook in the data (i.e., scientific publications classified by SDGs) of the most disadvantaged categories of individuals, the poorest countries, and underrepresented topics that SDG targets explicitly focus on. Conversely, an unsolicited hegemonic role played by economic superpowers and Global North is identified.

Scientometrics
Universidad de Granada (ES), German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon