The right to obtain an explanation of the decision-making procedure in an individual case under Article 86 (1) of the Artificial Intelligence Act – selected problems

The purpose of this paper is to analyse and evaluate the regulation of the right to obtain an explanation of the decision-making procedure in an individual case contained in Article 86 (1) of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). At the outset of the study, Article 22 (1) of the GDPR is also analysed in order to then establish what the interplay between the two provisions is. This will also make it possible to identify the potential risks associated with the exercise of the right established in Article 86 (1) of the AIA. The analysis carried out has allowed for the formulation of final conclusions, which show, inter alia, that the subjective and objective scope of Article 86 (1) of the AIA is broader than Article 22 (1) of the GDPR, the consequences of individual decisions justifying the use of Article 86 (1) of the AIA are so broad that in practice they can apply to almost every partial or complete ADM issued using a high-risk AI system. The paper uses a law-comparative method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Prawnicze KUL
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.18409
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The right to obtain an explanation of the decision-making procedure in an individual case under Article 86 (1) of the Artificial Intelligence Act – selected problems

Krystyna Nizioł
Studia Prawnicze KUL
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The right to obtain an explanation of the decision-making procedure in an individual case under Article 86 (1) of the Artificial Intelligence Act – selected problems

Krystyna Nizioł
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse and evaluate the regulation of the right to obtain an explanation of the decision-making procedure in an individual case contained in Article 86 (1) of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). At the outset of the study, Article 22 (1) of the GDPR is also analysed in order to then establish what the interplay between the two provisions is. This will also make it possible to identify the potential risks associated with the exercise of the right established in Article 86 (1) of the AIA. The analysis carried out has allowed for the formulation of final conclusions, which show, inter alia, that the subjective and objective scope of Article 86 (1) of the AIA is broader than Article 22 (1) of the GDPR, the consequences of individual decisions justifying the use of Article 86 (1) of the AIA are so broad that in practice they can apply to almost every partial or complete ADM issued using a high-risk AI system. The paper uses a law-comparative method.

Studia Prawnicze KUL(4)
University of Szczecin (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.