Study on the antioxidant properties of robusta and arabica coffee silverskin by-product with different degrees of grinding

This study evaluated the effects of coffee silverskin cultivar (Arabica and Robusta), grinding degree (<95 μm, 95–132 μm, >132 μm), and extraction solvent (water, ethanol) on the recovery of caffeine, chlorogenic acids, and antioxidant activity. Samples were analysed using HPLC, Folin-Ciocalteu, and antioxidant assays: DPPH and FRAP (ethanol-dependent), ABTS and metal chelation (water-dependent). Robusta contained significantly higher caffeine (6,604–10,534 μg/g) than Arabica (4,550–8,550 μg/g), while caffeine content did not differ with solvent. Intermediate particle size (95–132 μm) maximized caffeine extraction, while coarse particles (>132 μm) yielded more chlorogenic acids. Cultivar and grinding degree had minimal influence on Total phenolic content (TPC) of water extracts; however, Robusta exhibited higher TPC (44.3–79.9 mg GAE/g dry matter) in ethanol extracts. Robusta exhibited the highest antioxidant activities in all assays: metal-chelating (49.2 mg EDTA/g) and ABTS (462.3 mg Trolox/g) in water extracts; DPPH (142.5 mg Trolox/g) and FRAP (30.5 mM Fe²⁺/g) in ethanol extracts. Robusta silverskin showed significantly higher soluble dietary fiber (SDF) (13.1–15.4 g/100 g dry matter), while insoluble fiber did not differ with cultivar. These findings provide a basis for optimizing silverskin valorisation and its use as a sustainable bioactive source in functional food applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Foods
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100885
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the antioxidant properties of robusta and arabica coffee silverskin by-product with different degrees of grinding

Marzanna Hęś, Rita Alves, Jan Jakub Kucharski, Jarosław Walkowiak et al.
Future Foods
Coffee research and impacts
article

Study on the antioxidant properties of robusta and arabica coffee silverskin by-product with different degrees of grinding

Marzanna Hęś, Rita Alves, Jan Jakub Kucharski, Jarosław Walkowiak, Pathumi Ariyarathna, Susana Machado, Krzysztof Dziedzic, Maria Eduarda Martins Oliveira
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of coffee silverskin cultivar (Arabica and Robusta), grinding degree (<95 μm, 95–132 μm, >132 μm), and extraction solvent (water, ethanol) on the recovery of caffeine, chlorogenic acids, and antioxidant activity. Samples were analysed using HPLC, Folin-Ciocalteu, and antioxidant assays: DPPH and FRAP (ethanol-dependent), ABTS and metal chelation (water-dependent). Robusta contained significantly higher caffeine (6,604–10,534 μg/g) than Arabica (4,550–8,550 μg/g), while caffeine content did not differ with solvent. Intermediate particle size (95–132 μm) maximized caffeine extraction, while coarse particles (>132 μm) yielded more chlorogenic acids. Cultivar and grinding degree had minimal influence on Total phenolic content (TPC) of water extracts; however, Robusta exhibited higher TPC (44.3–79.9 mg GAE/g dry matter) in ethanol extracts. Robusta exhibited the highest antioxidant activities in all assays: metal-chelating (49.2 mg EDTA/g) and ABTS (462.3 mg Trolox/g) in water extracts; DPPH (142.5 mg Trolox/g) and FRAP (30.5 mM Fe²⁺/g) in ethanol extracts. Robusta silverskin showed significantly higher soluble dietary fiber (SDF) (13.1–15.4 g/100 g dry matter), while insoluble fiber did not differ with cultivar. These findings provide a basis for optimizing silverskin valorisation and its use as a sustainable bioactive source in functional food applications.

Future FoodsVol. 13
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), University of Life Sciences in Lublin (PL), Universidade do Porto (PT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.