Neuroethicists’ Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Neurotechnology Industry-Academia Partnerships

Neurotechnology is a rapidly growing area in medicine. New neurotechnologies are often developed through partnerships between industry and academia (i.e., "IA partnerships"). These partnerships face ethical challenges due to differing goals and priorities among stakeholders (e.g. scientific vs. fiduciary obligations). We interviewed neuroethicists (N = 15) to understand their perspectives on prominent ethical issues and potential solutions. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts revealed 12 themes. These themes included the potential for industry to unduly influence research, increasing communication among stakeholders, needing clearer and more transparent data management practices, prioritizing patients and involving them in device development, protecting scientific integrity and institutional reputation, enhancing informed consent, recognizing the unique challenges posed by neurotechnology, considering both short- and long-term impacts of neurotechnology, and increasing oversight of IA partnerships. Future research should explore how best to address these challenges through new policies, practices, regulations, and patient education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AJOB Neuroscience
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2025.2601350
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuroethicists’ Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Neurotechnology Industry-Academia Partnerships

Tristan McIntosh, Meredith Parsons, Erin D. Solomon, James M. DuBois et al.
AJOB Neuroscience
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Neuroethicists’ Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Neurotechnology Industry-Academia Partnerships

Tristan McIntosh, Meredith Parsons, Erin D. Solomon, James M. DuBois, Judith Mwobobia, Maya Skolnik
article en

Abstract

Neurotechnology is a rapidly growing area in medicine. New neurotechnologies are often developed through partnerships between industry and academia (i.e., "IA partnerships"). These partnerships face ethical challenges due to differing goals and priorities among stakeholders (e.g. scientific vs. fiduciary obligations). We interviewed neuroethicists (N = 15) to understand their perspectives on prominent ethical issues and potential solutions. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts revealed 12 themes. These themes included the potential for industry to unduly influence research, increasing communication among stakeholders, needing clearer and more transparent data management practices, prioritizing patients and involving them in device development, protecting scientific integrity and institutional reputation, enhancing informed consent, recognizing the unique challenges posed by neurotechnology, considering both short- and long-term impacts of neurotechnology, and increasing oversight of IA partnerships. Future research should explore how best to address these challenges through new policies, practices, regulations, and patient education.

AJOB Neuroscience
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neuroethicists’ Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Neurotechnology Industry-Academia Partnerships — Tristan McIntosh, Meredith Parsons, et al. · AJOB Neuroscience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS