Deep learning-based non-contrast MRI model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis: an end-to-end gadolinium-free solution

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) diagnosis and routine follow-up for recurrence typically rely on contrast-enhanced MRI. This study introduces a deep learning model for diagnosing NPC using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach helps avoid safety concerns related to GBCA deposition, while also shortening scan times and reducing costs. In this study, we propose an innovative deep learning model for NPC diagnosis using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach not only mitigates potential safety concerns associated with residual GBCA deposition but also reduces scan time and examination costs. The study consisted of three phases. Firstly, a novel knowledge distilled modality fusion model is developed using a cohort of 854 cases and tested its performance on an internal set (257 cases, AUC = 0.95) and an independent external set (277 cases, AUC = 0.86). Secondly, the proposed method was compared with: (1) Non-contrast MRI without model improvement (Baseline 1) and (2) current virtual-contrast enhancement-based NPC diagnosis using three state-of-the-art methods (Baselines 2-4). The proposed model consistently outperformed Baselines 1 on both internal dataset (AUC: 0.95 vs. 0.93) and external test set (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.82). Additionally, it surpassed Baselines 2-4, achieving performance gains of 6.7%, 69.8%, and 28.6% in AUC, over three state-of-the-art methods. Thirdly, the effectiveness of this model was evaluated through a fully crossed multi-reader, multi-case study involving 13 readers from 6 hospitals. The results showed that with AI assistance, readers could diagnose NPC using only non-contrast MRI, achieving results that were not inferior to contrast-enhanced imaging (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.93, p<0.01). In conclusion, this study demonstrated the model's potential as a safe, cost-effective, and GBCA-free option for NPC diagnosis in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02247-0
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-based non-contrast MRI model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis: an end-to-end gadolinium-free solution

L Wang, Yefeng Zheng, Yongkang WANG, Feidi Liu et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Deep learning-based non-contrast MRI model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis: an end-to-end gadolinium-free solution

L Wang, Yefeng Zheng, Yongkang WANG, Feidi Liu, L. Kong, X Chen, Yuxuan Shi, Xiaojing Yang, H M Yu, Shang Yuchen Shi, Jingsong Ouyang, Georges El Fakhri, Mingyan Qiu, Jonghye Woo, Meng Ye, Xueli Liu, Xi Liu, Jiyi Hu, Zhen Li, Yafei Dong, Xicai Sun, Di Zhou, Wentao Gong, Jiayu Lu, Yiqian Shi
article en

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) diagnosis and routine follow-up for recurrence typically rely on contrast-enhanced MRI. This study introduces a deep learning model for diagnosing NPC using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach helps avoid safety concerns related to GBCA deposition, while also shortening scan times and reducing costs. In this study, we propose an innovative deep learning model for NPC diagnosis using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach not only mitigates potential safety concerns associated with residual GBCA deposition but also reduces scan time and examination costs. The study consisted of three phases. Firstly, a novel knowledge distilled modality fusion model is developed using a cohort of 854 cases and tested its performance on an internal set (257 cases, AUC = 0.95) and an independent external set (277 cases, AUC = 0.86). Secondly, the proposed method was compared with: (1) Non-contrast MRI without model improvement (Baseline 1) and (2) current virtual-contrast enhancement-based NPC diagnosis using three state-of-the-art methods (Baselines 2-4). The proposed model consistently outperformed Baselines 1 on both internal dataset (AUC: 0.95 vs. 0.93) and external test set (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.82). Additionally, it surpassed Baselines 2-4, achieving performance gains of 6.7%, 69.8%, and 28.6% in AUC, over three state-of-the-art methods. Thirdly, the effectiveness of this model was evaluated through a fully crossed multi-reader, multi-case study involving 13 readers from 6 hospitals. The results showed that with AI assistance, readers could diagnose NPC using only non-contrast MRI, achieving results that were not inferior to contrast-enhanced imaging (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.93, p<0.01). In conclusion, this study demonstrated the model's potential as a safe, cost-effective, and GBCA-free option for NPC diagnosis in clinical practice.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Broad Institute (US), Boston University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Westlake University (CN), Yale University (US), Gordon Center for Medical Imaging (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Suizhou Central Hospital (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Shanghai Institute of Hematology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.