Harmony or discord: analyzing stakeholders’ viewpoints on Islamic banking

Purpose This study aims to examine how key stakeholders – Shariah scholars, Islamic bankers and Islamic economists – perceive the interplay and potential tensions between Shariah compliance, service quality and social well-being in realizing the Maqasid Shariah within Islamic banking. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative, interpretivist approach, this study draws on 18 semi-structured interviews with purposively selected participants from three stakeholder groups, supplemented by documentary analysis of relevant industry reports. Inductive Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA), aided by NVivo, was employed to capture converging and diverging perspectives. Findings The analysis reveals that while all three dimensions are considered integral, prioritization varies. Shariah scholars regard Shariah compliance as the non-negotiable foundation, Islamic bankers emphasize service quality as a driver of customer trust and operational success and Islamic economists place social well-being at the heart of Islamic banking legitimacy. Tensions often emerge when institutional structures treat these objectives as isolated rather than interdependent. However, participants pointed to several ways of bridging this divide. These include embedding Maqasid-aligned criteria into product design, using technology to integrate Shariah compliance and service quality, and adopting standardized metrics to measure social impact of Islamic banking. Research limitations/implications The research is context-specific to Pakistan, focused on three stakeholder groups and based on a purposive sample, which may limit its generalizability. Future studies could adopt cross-country comparisons, longitudinal designs and incorporate customer and regulator perspectives to broaden applicability. Practical implications Findings offer actionable strategies for integrating Shariah compliance, service quality and social well-being through institutional design, performance measurement and technology-enabled solutions. Social implications By fostering synergies among the three dimensions, Islamic banking can fulfill both its legal obligations and its societal mandate, contributing to equitable economic development and enhanced community trust. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by offering a multi-stakeholder perspective on Islamic banking’s ethical framework. It highlights the tensions and synergies among its three core values and presents a pathway toward a more holistic and socially responsive Islamic financial model grounded in Maqasid Shariah.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-04-2025-0115
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmony or discord: analyzing stakeholders’ viewpoints on Islamic banking

Khalid Hussain, Rafiullah Sheikh
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Harmony or discord: analyzing stakeholders’ viewpoints on Islamic banking

Khalid Hussain, Rafiullah Sheikh
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how key stakeholders – Shariah scholars, Islamic bankers and Islamic economists – perceive the interplay and potential tensions between Shariah compliance, service quality and social well-being in realizing the Maqasid Shariah within Islamic banking. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative, interpretivist approach, this study draws on 18 semi-structured interviews with purposively selected participants from three stakeholder groups, supplemented by documentary analysis of relevant industry reports. Inductive Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA), aided by NVivo, was employed to capture converging and diverging perspectives. Findings The analysis reveals that while all three dimensions are considered integral, prioritization varies. Shariah scholars regard Shariah compliance as the non-negotiable foundation, Islamic bankers emphasize service quality as a driver of customer trust and operational success and Islamic economists place social well-being at the heart of Islamic banking legitimacy. Tensions often emerge when institutional structures treat these objectives as isolated rather than interdependent. However, participants pointed to several ways of bridging this divide. These include embedding Maqasid-aligned criteria into product design, using technology to integrate Shariah compliance and service quality, and adopting standardized metrics to measure social impact of Islamic banking. Research limitations/implications The research is context-specific to Pakistan, focused on three stakeholder groups and based on a purposive sample, which may limit its generalizability. Future studies could adopt cross-country comparisons, longitudinal designs and incorporate customer and regulator perspectives to broaden applicability. Practical implications Findings offer actionable strategies for integrating Shariah compliance, service quality and social well-being through institutional design, performance measurement and technology-enabled solutions. Social implications By fostering synergies among the three dimensions, Islamic banking can fulfill both its legal obligations and its societal mandate, contributing to equitable economic development and enhanced community trust. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by offering a multi-stakeholder perspective on Islamic banking’s ethical framework. It highlights the tensions and synergies among its three core values and presents a pathway toward a more holistic and socially responsive Islamic financial model grounded in Maqasid Shariah.

Qualitative Research in Financial Markets
Riphah International University (PK), Bahria University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.