Selecting Student Representatives by Sortition

ABSTRACT Student Representatives (Reps) are a key component of the student voice. A variety of models are used for the selection of Reps, but conventionally it is a voluntary process with or without an election element. Here we describe our experiences of using an alternative model of Rep recruitment in a UK‐China transnational education context. We used sortition: the random selection of Reps from the entire student population. When asked about sortition in comparison with the conventional selection process, students communicated concerns about the motivation and competency of Reps selected by sortition, and some were critical of the structure and legitimacy of the process. However, some recognised that sortition was fairer and more inclusive than a conventional election‐based process. Our experiences show that sortition can be a viable method of Rep selection, but students should be given opportunities to understand and discuss the sortition process and the intention behind its use. In a cultural context where the focus can often be on high‐status students, we contend that sortition—in this and other educational contexts—has a potential role in enhancing all students' agency, ultimately promoting a more inclusive academic environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70098
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting Student Representatives by Sortition

Michael I. Daw, Céline Caquineau, John Menzies
Higher Education Quarterly
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Selecting Student Representatives by Sortition

Michael I. Daw, Céline Caquineau, John Menzies
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Student Representatives (Reps) are a key component of the student voice. A variety of models are used for the selection of Reps, but conventionally it is a voluntary process with or without an election element. Here we describe our experiences of using an alternative model of Rep recruitment in a UK‐China transnational education context. We used sortition: the random selection of Reps from the entire student population. When asked about sortition in comparison with the conventional selection process, students communicated concerns about the motivation and competency of Reps selected by sortition, and some were critical of the structure and legitimacy of the process. However, some recognised that sortition was fairer and more inclusive than a conventional election‐based process. Our experiences show that sortition can be a viable method of Rep selection, but students should be given opportunities to understand and discuss the sortition process and the intention behind its use. In a cultural context where the focus can often be on high‐status students, we contend that sortition—in this and other educational contexts—has a potential role in enhancing all students' agency, ultimately promoting a more inclusive academic environment.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 80(1)
Medical Research Scotland (GB), Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.