The CAI Database: <sup>26</sup> Al– <sup>26</sup> Mg Isotope Systematics
Abstract We present a publicly available calcium–aluminum-rich inclusion (CAI) database that focuses on the initial 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio in CAIs, designed in a way that researchers in cosmochemistry and astrophysics may find useful. To date, the database contains 497 CAIs from 75 peer-reviewed papers. The CAIs are from all chondrite groups and cover different CAI types, textures, and sizes. The database includes the paper; the host meteorite; the CAI name and type; the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and δ 25 Mg values and their uncertainties; the number of regression points; the maximum 27 Al/ 24 Mg; the mean-squared weighted deviation; the CAI size; and CAI descriptions. We grouped the CAIs in different ways to discuss 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio distributions with implications for the CAI formation timeline. Overall, we agree with previous authors that CAIs have a bimodal 26 Al distribution: CAIs with robust isochrons ( n = 151) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 4.8 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.1), while those with isotopic anomalies ( n = 87) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 0.3 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.2). However, the large standard deviation of both groups (1.3 and 2.3, respectively) indicates that the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 values scatter significantly within each population. CAI types and groups can have distinct 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , but the unmelted inclusions ( n = 33) have the highest median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 5.1 × 10 −5 and a low median <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> = −0.05‰. We find slightly different 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 distributions between CAI chondrite types, but no differences between petrographic types or sizes. These observations can help us to understand CAI formation in the context of astrophysical models.
Authors
- K. D. McKeegan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-729X)
- Fatima Jorge-Chavez
- Danielle Leuer
- François L. H. Tissot
- Aman Burman
- Ming-Chang Liu
- Ashley K. Herbst
- Emilie T. Dunham
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Published
- 2025-12-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae1835
- Primary Topic
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00