The CAI Database: <sup>26</sup> Al– <sup>26</sup> Mg Isotope Systematics

Abstract We present a publicly available calcium–aluminum-rich inclusion (CAI) database that focuses on the initial 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio in CAIs, designed in a way that researchers in cosmochemistry and astrophysics may find useful. To date, the database contains 497 CAIs from 75 peer-reviewed papers. The CAIs are from all chondrite groups and cover different CAI types, textures, and sizes. The database includes the paper; the host meteorite; the CAI name and type; the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and δ 25 Mg values and their uncertainties; the number of regression points; the maximum 27 Al/ 24 Mg; the mean-squared weighted deviation; the CAI size; and CAI descriptions. We grouped the CAIs in different ways to discuss 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio distributions with implications for the CAI formation timeline. Overall, we agree with previous authors that CAIs have a bimodal 26 Al distribution: CAIs with robust isochrons ( n = 151) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 4.8 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.1), while those with isotopic anomalies ( n = 87) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 0.3 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.2). However, the large standard deviation of both groups (1.3 and 2.3, respectively) indicates that the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 values scatter significantly within each population. CAI types and groups can have distinct 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , but the unmelted inclusions ( n = 33) have the highest median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 5.1 × 10 −5 and a low median <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> = −0.05‰. We find slightly different 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 distributions between CAI chondrite types, but no differences between petrographic types or sizes. These observations can help us to understand CAI formation in the context of astrophysical models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae1835
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CAI Database: 26 Al– 26 Mg Isotope Systematics

K. D. McKeegan, Fatima Jorge-Chavez, Danielle Leuer, François L. H. Tissot et al.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Astro and Planetary Science
article

The CAI Database: 26 Al– 26 Mg Isotope Systematics

K. D. McKeegan, Fatima Jorge-Chavez, Danielle Leuer, François L. H. Tissot, Aman Burman, Ming-Chang Liu, Ashley K. Herbst, Emilie T. Dunham
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present a publicly available calcium–aluminum-rich inclusion (CAI) database that focuses on the initial 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio in CAIs, designed in a way that researchers in cosmochemistry and astrophysics may find useful. To date, the database contains 497 CAIs from 75 peer-reviewed papers. The CAIs are from all chondrite groups and cover different CAI types, textures, and sizes. The database includes the paper; the host meteorite; the CAI name and type; the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and δ 25 Mg values and their uncertainties; the number of regression points; the maximum 27 Al/ 24 Mg; the mean-squared weighted deviation; the CAI size; and CAI descriptions. We grouped the CAIs in different ways to discuss 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 ratio distributions with implications for the CAI formation timeline. Overall, we agree with previous authors that CAIs have a bimodal 26 Al distribution: CAIs with robust isochrons ( n = 151) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 4.8 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.1), while those with isotopic anomalies ( n = 87) have a median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 0.3 × 10 −5 (with a 1 σ standard error of 0.2). However, the large standard deviation of both groups (1.3 and 2.3, respectively) indicates that the 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 values scatter significantly within each population. CAI types and groups can have distinct 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , but the unmelted inclusions ( n = 33) have the highest median 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 = 5.1 × 10 −5 and a low median <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> = −0.05‰. We find slightly different 26 Al/ 27 Al 0 distributions between CAI chondrite types, but no differences between petrographic types or sizes. These observations can help us to understand CAI formation in the context of astrophysical models.

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesVol. 282(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.