Correction of Background in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy for Accurate Determination of Particle Number

Since the early development of Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), it has been recognized that background intensity can lead to artifacts in the amplitude of the autocorrelation function (ACF) and, consequently, to inaccurate estimates of particle numbers. Here, we present a protocol for quantitative background evaluation and amplitude correction in FCS experiments, applicable to different sources of background such as detector noise, autofluorescence, and light scattering. We demonstrate the performance of our approach through three representative case studies: (i) FCS measurements of a bright fluorophore at low concentration, (ii) FCS of dim nanoparticles affected by solvent Raman scattering, and (iii) FCS performed using a confocal setup equipped with a SPAD array, where background originates from detector hot pixels. These examples represent typical experimental conditions in which background signals compromise quantitative interpretation, illustrating how our protocol restores accuracy and reproducibility in FCS analysis. By systematically identifying and correcting these effects, the proposed protocol addresses a long-standing limitation of FCS and provides a robust framework for improving the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative fluorescence measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomolecules
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16010011
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction of Background in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy for Accurate Determination of Particle Number

Elisabetta Di Franco, Giuseppe Vicidomini, Luca Lanzanò, Greta Paternò et al.
Biomolecules
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

Correction of Background in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy for Accurate Determination of Particle Number

Elisabetta Di Franco, Giuseppe Vicidomini, Luca Lanzanò, Greta Paternò, Paolo Bianchini, Paolo Musumeci, Marco Castello, Maria José Lo Faro, Elisa Longo, A. Diaspro, Elena Bruno, Nunzio Tuccitto
article en

Abstract

Since the early development of Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), it has been recognized that background intensity can lead to artifacts in the amplitude of the autocorrelation function (ACF) and, consequently, to inaccurate estimates of particle numbers. Here, we present a protocol for quantitative background evaluation and amplitude correction in FCS experiments, applicable to different sources of background such as detector noise, autofluorescence, and light scattering. We demonstrate the performance of our approach through three representative case studies: (i) FCS measurements of a bright fluorophore at low concentration, (ii) FCS of dim nanoparticles affected by solvent Raman scattering, and (iii) FCS performed using a confocal setup equipped with a SPAD array, where background originates from detector hot pixels. These examples represent typical experimental conditions in which background signals compromise quantitative interpretation, illustrating how our protocol restores accuracy and reproducibility in FCS analysis. By systematically identifying and correcting these effects, the proposed protocol addresses a long-standing limitation of FCS and provides a robust framework for improving the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative fluorescence measurements.

BiomoleculesVol. 16(1)
Italian Institute of Technology (IT), University of Catania (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Catania (IT), Centro Siciliano di Fisica Nucleare e di Struttura della Materia (IT), Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Commissione Scientifica Nazionale 5, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.