For a Responsible Inexpertise: A Conversation with Philippe Van Parijs

In this conversation, Philippe Van Parijs reconstructs his intellectual trajectory, which, starting from philosophical interests, gradually defined itself in an interdisciplinary program that combines political philosophy and the social sciences. His initial epistemological interests gave way to a focus more on issues of justice, discussing themes already present in Marx and Mill, but revisited in light of new debates. The interview also explores the evolution of the September Group’s collective experience, leading to a discussion of the possibility and necessity of a professionally interdisciplinary way of doing social science today. On this last point, Van Parijs asserts the urgent need for academics to participate in public debate in the spirit of what he calls “responsible inexpertise”, a way of avoiding both the fragmentation of knowledge and confinement to the ivory tower.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologica
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/22507
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For a Responsible Inexpertise: A Conversation with Philippe Van Parijs

Riccardo Emilio Chesta, Philippe Van Parijs
Sociologica
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
article

For a Responsible Inexpertise: A Conversation with Philippe Van Parijs

Riccardo Emilio Chesta, Philippe Van Parijs
article en

Abstract

In this conversation, Philippe Van Parijs reconstructs his intellectual trajectory, which, starting from philosophical interests, gradually defined itself in an interdisciplinary program that combines political philosophy and the social sciences. His initial epistemological interests gave way to a focus more on issues of justice, discussing themes already present in Marx and Mill, but revisited in light of new debates. The interview also explores the evolution of the September Group’s collective experience, leading to a discussion of the possibility and necessity of a professionally interdisciplinary way of doing social science today. On this last point, Van Parijs asserts the urgent need for academics to participate in public debate in the spirit of what he calls “responsible inexpertise”, a way of avoiding both the fragmentation of knowledge and confinement to the ivory tower.

SociologicaVol. 19(3)
Politecnico di Milano (IT), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

For a Responsible Inexpertise: A Conversation with Philippe Van Parijs — Riccardo Emilio Chesta, Philippe Van Parijs · Sociologica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS