Labelling deepfakes in terms of EU law: The AI Act and beyond

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can create various types of content. Some of this content includes so-called deepfakes, which resemble actual content, such as the likeness of famous individuals, but are not genuine. The latest EU regulation – the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) – introduces the requirement to label such content as artificially generated or manipulated. This article discusses these obligations and explains the provisions of the AI Act. It also outlines the practical implications of the new regulations and how to comply with them. However, the AI Act is not the only legal framework mandating the labelling of AI-generated content. The article’s thesis, which was ultimately confirmed, is that the AI Act is not the sole source of such obligations under EU law. Similar requirements also stem from EU competition and consumer protection laws, specifically Directive 2006/114 and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The article provides a detailed analysis of these directives, which may serve as a basis for requiring market participants to label GenAI-generated content. It also explains how entities using AI can comply with these obligations, offering examples of specific actions. The article was prepared using the legal-dogmatic research method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2025.87.4.08
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labelling deepfakes in terms of EU law: The AI Act and beyond

Dominik Gabor
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Labelling deepfakes in terms of EU law: The AI Act and beyond

Dominik Gabor
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can create various types of content. Some of this content includes so-called deepfakes, which resemble actual content, such as the likeness of famous individuals, but are not genuine. The latest EU regulation – the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) – introduces the requirement to label such content as artificially generated or manipulated. This article discusses these obligations and explains the provisions of the AI Act. It also outlines the practical implications of the new regulations and how to comply with them. However, the AI Act is not the only legal framework mandating the labelling of AI-generated content. The article’s thesis, which was ultimately confirmed, is that the AI Act is not the sole source of such obligations under EU law. Similar requirements also stem from EU competition and consumer protection laws, specifically Directive 2006/114 and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The article provides a detailed analysis of these directives, which may serve as a basis for requiring market participants to label GenAI-generated content. It also explains how entities using AI can comply with these obligations, offering examples of specific actions. The article was prepared using the legal-dogmatic research method.

Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i SocjologicznyVol. 87(4)
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.