Reliability of Bite Marks in Forensic Investigations: A Review

Introduction: Bite marks play a vital role in forensic investigations, serving as key evidence in both criminal and civil cases.While fingerprint and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis remain the cornerstones for the identification of an individual, the study of bite marks can be an interesting and beneficial adjunct for identification as well.Methodology: This review outlines various methodologies used for bite mark comparison and includes an examination of documented cases where bite mark evidence was instrumental.It also considers scientific literature that questions the reliability of bite marks as forensic evidence.Discussion: Bite mark analysis is often the most presented form of dental evidence in court.Though bite marks are as unique as fingerprints and no two individuals are considered to have the same bite marks, the subjective view in their analysis, as well as multiple scientific data, is now questioning the reliability of bite marks as evidence.Conclusion: Bite mark analysis remains a crucial component of forensic odontology.However, its role as reliable evidence is increasingly being scrutinized.This review emphasizes the need for careful evaluation and further research to establish its credibility in forensic science.