Effects of preferred music listening on physical and psychological parameters in sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

This meta-analysis examined the effects of preferred music listening (PML) versus non-preferred music listening (NPML) and no music listening (NML) on psychological and physical performance outcomes in adolescent and adult athletes. A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE. After screening 3146 records and applying predefined eligibility criteria, 41 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were synthesized for psychological parameters (perceived exertion, motivation, affective response) and physical parameters (strength endurance, power output, maximal strength, aerobic endurance, speed). Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify potential moderating effects of age, sex, music choice, and timing. Statistically significant overall effects favoring PML were found for psychological outcomes, including a reduction in perceived exertion (SMD = − 0.36, 95% CI [− 0.65, − 0.08]), an increase in motivation (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.60, 1.10]), and a more positive affective response (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI [0.13, 2.20]). For physical outcomes, significant between-condition differences were observed for strength endurance (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI [0.42, 1.01]), maximal strength (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI [0.20, 0.85]), and power output (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI [0.12, 0.81]), however subgroup comparisons with NPML were less consistent due to high heterogeneity. NPML showed slightly higher values than NML in some psychological and physical parameters, while no advantage was observed for speed or aerobic endurance. PML was associated with higher motivation, more positive affective responses, lower perceived exertion, and superior strength- and power-related performance compared to non-preferred and no music conditions. These findings reflect between-condition comparisons and emphasize the importance of individual preference in optimizing exercise experiences. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251083551. • PML is associated with higher motivation, more positive affective responses, and lower perceived exertion compared to NML. • PML improves strength endurance, maximal strength, and power output, showing clear benefits for physical performance. • NPML is superior to NML for motivation, but shows no advantage for speed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01470-2
Primary Topic
Music Therapy and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of preferred music listening on physical and psychological parameters in sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

Rainer Beurskens, Johanna Seifert, Alexander Glahn, Marc Niering et al.
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Music Therapy and Health
article

Effects of preferred music listening on physical and psychological parameters in sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

Rainer Beurskens, Johanna Seifert, Alexander Glahn, Marc Niering, Paul Munkelt, Benedikt Zirkel, Franziska Gellert
article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the effects of preferred music listening (PML) versus non-preferred music listening (NPML) and no music listening (NML) on psychological and physical performance outcomes in adolescent and adult athletes. A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE. After screening 3146 records and applying predefined eligibility criteria, 41 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were synthesized for psychological parameters (perceived exertion, motivation, affective response) and physical parameters (strength endurance, power output, maximal strength, aerobic endurance, speed). Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify potential moderating effects of age, sex, music choice, and timing. Statistically significant overall effects favoring PML were found for psychological outcomes, including a reduction in perceived exertion (SMD = − 0.36, 95% CI [− 0.65, − 0.08]), an increase in motivation (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.60, 1.10]), and a more positive affective response (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI [0.13, 2.20]). For physical outcomes, significant between-condition differences were observed for strength endurance (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI [0.42, 1.01]), maximal strength (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI [0.20, 0.85]), and power output (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI [0.12, 0.81]), however subgroup comparisons with NPML were less consistent due to high heterogeneity. NPML showed slightly higher values than NML in some psychological and physical parameters, while no advantage was observed for speed or aerobic endurance. PML was associated with higher motivation, more positive affective responses, lower perceived exertion, and superior strength- and power-related performance compared to non-preferred and no music conditions. These findings reflect between-condition comparisons and emphasize the importance of individual preference in optimizing exercise experiences. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251083551. • PML is associated with higher motivation, more positive affective responses, and lower perceived exertion compared to NML. • PML improves strength endurance, maximal strength, and power output, showing clear benefits for physical performance. • NPML is superior to NML for motivation, but shows no advantage for speed.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 18(1)
Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Paderborn University (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), KRH Klinikum Nordstadt (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Music Therapy and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.