When is a standard a ‘standard’? An exploratory study on the standards used in the training of facilitators in Philosophy for/with Children

The popularisation of the Philosophy for/with Children (P4/wC) pedagogical method has given rise to a range of diverse training programs for prospective philosophical dialogue facilitators. This raises questions around what types of standards and practices are being targeted in these programs, as well as around the sorts of facilitator competencies being valued, identified and developed. What, for instance, are some of the similarities and dissimilarities between providers of training programs? A questionnaire was developed by the authors, each experienced in P4/wC facilitation, and forwarded to seventeen established P4/wC facilitator training providers across nine countries. An analysis of responses revealed that while facilitator competencies, such as ‘listening skills’, figured in responses, references to sound ‘management skills’ featured more frequently than ‘facilitation skills’. Additionally, while the possession of a philosophical or pedagogical background of facilitator candidates was typically not required, responses were suggestive that facilitators could in time attain the desired pedagogical and philosophical knowledge and experience to effectively facilitate the P4/wC method. In this study, we examine these and other findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy in Schools
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46707/f8344f02
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When is a standard a ‘standard’? An exploratory study on the standards used in the training of facilitators in Philosophy for/with Children

Sofia Nikolidaki, Jelle De Schrijver, Joana Rita Sousa, Ozge Ozdemir et al.
Journal of Philosophy in Schools
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

When is a standard a ‘standard’? An exploratory study on the standards used in the training of facilitators in Philosophy for/with Children

Sofia Nikolidaki, Jelle De Schrijver, Joana Rita Sousa, Ozge Ozdemir, Harry Galatis
article en

Abstract

The popularisation of the Philosophy for/with Children (P4/wC) pedagogical method has given rise to a range of diverse training programs for prospective philosophical dialogue facilitators. This raises questions around what types of standards and practices are being targeted in these programs, as well as around the sorts of facilitator competencies being valued, identified and developed. What, for instance, are some of the similarities and dissimilarities between providers of training programs? A questionnaire was developed by the authors, each experienced in P4/wC facilitation, and forwarded to seventeen established P4/wC facilitator training providers across nine countries. An analysis of responses revealed that while facilitator competencies, such as ‘listening skills’, figured in responses, references to sound ‘management skills’ featured more frequently than ‘facilitation skills’. Additionally, while the possession of a philosophical or pedagogical background of facilitator candidates was typically not required, responses were suggestive that facilitators could in time attain the desired pedagogical and philosophical knowledge and experience to effectively facilitate the P4/wC method. In this study, we examine these and other findings.

Journal of Philosophy in SchoolsVol. 12(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.