A qualitative study on addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in marginalised communities in the UK - Professional and public perspectives

BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is known to be a significant issue for vaccination programmes. It has been shown to be particularly significant in communities marginalised by ethnicity, poverty and other social factors.ObjectiveIn this paper we report on the efforts of the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme to overcome vaccine hesitancy in one locality, and how those efforts were viewed by the people targeted by and delivering the initiatives.MethodWe conducted a qualitative study, interviewing staff delivering the vaccination programme (n = 8) and community members drawn from marginalised groups (n = 40). Framework thematic analysis was used.ResultsThe diversity of the marginalised communities in terms of their immigration status, language, cultural needs and other characteristics required extensive and varied efforts by services to deliver vaccine equity initiatives. These efforts included offering vaccines in community centres and places of worship, involving community and faith leaders to build trust among communities, delivering information in different languages and offering gift vouchers. Community members had a complex mixture of reasons for accepting or not accepting the vaccine. Reasons for not accepting the vaccine included a lack of trust in vaccine effectiveness and what were perceived as coercive measures by the state.ConclusionThe initiatives were perceived to be broadly successful in promoting COVID-19 vaccine uptake, however there were no precise measures of success or failure of individual components. Policy and health services need to consider the complex and dynamic nature of vaccine hesitancy and build trust and improve communication with marginalised groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251409115
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative study on addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in marginalised communities in the UK - Professional and public perspectives

Stephen Timmons, Mimi Salome Gbadesire, Basharat Hussain, Benjamin Duke et al.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

A qualitative study on addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in marginalised communities in the UK - Professional and public perspectives

Stephen Timmons, Mimi Salome Gbadesire, Basharat Hussain, Benjamin Duke, Helen Marson-Smith, Sadaf Khurshid
article en

Abstract

BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is known to be a significant issue for vaccination programmes. It has been shown to be particularly significant in communities marginalised by ethnicity, poverty and other social factors.ObjectiveIn this paper we report on the efforts of the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme to overcome vaccine hesitancy in one locality, and how those efforts were viewed by the people targeted by and delivering the initiatives.MethodWe conducted a qualitative study, interviewing staff delivering the vaccination programme (n = 8) and community members drawn from marginalised groups (n = 40). Framework thematic analysis was used.ResultsThe diversity of the marginalised communities in terms of their immigration status, language, cultural needs and other characteristics required extensive and varied efforts by services to deliver vaccine equity initiatives. These efforts included offering vaccines in community centres and places of worship, involving community and faith leaders to build trust among communities, delivering information in different languages and offering gift vouchers. Community members had a complex mixture of reasons for accepting or not accepting the vaccine. Reasons for not accepting the vaccine included a lack of trust in vaccine effectiveness and what were perceived as coercive measures by the state.ConclusionThe initiatives were perceived to be broadly successful in promoting COVID-19 vaccine uptake, however there were no precise measures of success or failure of individual components. Policy and health services need to consider the complex and dynamic nature of vaccine hesitancy and build trust and improve communication with marginalised groups.

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.