Non-covalent Interactions at the QM–MM Interface in the Semiempirical and Density Functional Limit

This study evaluated non-covalent interactions in hydrogen-bonded complexes using QM/MM methods, with a focus on the limitations introduced by the QM-MM boundary. The QM region was treated using two representative methods: the density functional theory (DFT) functional ωB97X-V and the semiempirical density functional tight binding (DFTB) model, while the general Amber force field (GAFF) was used for the MM region. The QM-MM interface was found to significantly contribute to the error even when a higher-level QM method was employed. For neutral dimers of small molecules, models generally performed similarly, with GAFF/ωB97X-V yielding the most accurate results. Errors were not primarily linked to charge transfer but instead to differences in polarity and polarizability. In ionic dimers, charge transfer was both larger and more closely tied to QM/MM errors; accurate modeling required the QM region to encompass the charge transfer and hydrogen bond─otherwise, the errors increased sharply. Also, the poor performance of QM/MM methods at shorter intermolecular distances originated primarily from unoptimized LJ parameters. For more realistic, cluster-type microenvironments, QM/MM models showed lower relative errors compared to gas-phase dimers, although increased interface complexity hindered trend identification. Scaling the QM-MM electronic interaction moderately improved the interaction energy accuracy for some models, but it was not transferable. We highlighted the importance of including key interaction sites, especially hydrogen-bond acceptors, in the QM region and avoiding QM-MM boundaries crossing ionic hydrogen bonds. In addition, to support further use of our data, all QM/MM topologies compatible with AMBER and GROMACS are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01621
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-covalent Interactions at the QM–MM Interface in the Semiempirical and Density Functional Limit

Julian Böser, Marcus Elstner, Qiang Cui, Van-Quan Vuong et al.
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Crystallography and molecular interactions
1.75
article

Non-covalent Interactions at the QM–MM Interface in the Semiempirical and Density Functional Limit

Julian Böser, Marcus Elstner, Qiang Cui, Van-Quan Vuong, Tomáš Kubař
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated non-covalent interactions in hydrogen-bonded complexes using QM/MM methods, with a focus on the limitations introduced by the QM-MM boundary. The QM region was treated using two representative methods: the density functional theory (DFT) functional ωB97X-V and the semiempirical density functional tight binding (DFTB) model, while the general Amber force field (GAFF) was used for the MM region. The QM-MM interface was found to significantly contribute to the error even when a higher-level QM method was employed. For neutral dimers of small molecules, models generally performed similarly, with GAFF/ωB97X-V yielding the most accurate results. Errors were not primarily linked to charge transfer but instead to differences in polarity and polarizability. In ionic dimers, charge transfer was both larger and more closely tied to QM/MM errors; accurate modeling required the QM region to encompass the charge transfer and hydrogen bond─otherwise, the errors increased sharply. Also, the poor performance of QM/MM methods at shorter intermolecular distances originated primarily from unoptimized LJ parameters. For more realistic, cluster-type microenvironments, QM/MM models showed lower relative errors compared to gas-phase dimers, although increased interface complexity hindered trend identification. Scaling the QM-MM electronic interaction moderately improved the interaction energy accuracy for some models, but it was not transferable. We highlighted the importance of including key interaction sites, especially hydrogen-bond acceptors, in the QM region and avoiding QM-MM boundaries crossing ionic hydrogen bonds. In addition, to support further use of our data, all QM/MM topologies compatible with AMBER and GROMACS are provided.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 22(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics (PL), Institute of Nanotechnology (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.