Effectiveness of Finite Element Modelling in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Review of Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a biomechanical simulation tool in surgical planning, but its adoption and methodological quality vary geographically, as a focused analysis of its application in Saudi Arabia is lacking. This review synthesized and evaluated the methodological rigor, biomechanical insights, and translational relevance of Saudi-based studies employing FEA in maxillofacial surgery. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a registered International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) protocol. Databases were searched for studies with affiliation to Saudi Arabia. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using a bespoke tool based on the FEA best practice. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Three eligible studies covered diverse applications, including mandibular reconstruction, orthognathic surgery, and cranioplasty. Quality assessment revealed methodological heterogeneity, as all studies used patient-specific or anatomically accurate models, but critical best practices have been inconsistently applied. Only one study reported a mesh convergence analysis, while none of the studies performed an experimental validation of their FEA biomechanical predictions. The overall risk of bias was rated moderate to high. Certainty of evidence for any biomechanical outcome was very low according to GRADE. Saudi-based FEA research on maxillofacial surgery is sparse and methodologically nascent. Although technical capabilities in model generation exist, critical gaps in numerical verification (mesh convergence) and experimental validation limit the reliability and translational potential of the findings, underscoring the need to establish standardized, high-quality research protocols to advance data-driven surgical planning in Saudi Arabia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.99790
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Finite Element Modelling in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Review of Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Mohammed Salah Allahyani, Ahmed Mohammed Saad Alghamdi, Khalid Alghamdi, Meshari A Alghamdi et al.
Cureus
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Effectiveness of Finite Element Modelling in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Review of Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Mohammed Salah Allahyani, Ahmed Mohammed Saad Alghamdi, Khalid Alghamdi, Meshari A Alghamdi, Muhannad Alghamdi, Soltan Alzahrani, Ahmed S Alghamdi, Khalid Al Zahrani
article en

Abstract

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a biomechanical simulation tool in surgical planning, but its adoption and methodological quality vary geographically, as a focused analysis of its application in Saudi Arabia is lacking. This review synthesized and evaluated the methodological rigor, biomechanical insights, and translational relevance of Saudi-based studies employing FEA in maxillofacial surgery. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a registered International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) protocol. Databases were searched for studies with affiliation to Saudi Arabia. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using a bespoke tool based on the FEA best practice. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Three eligible studies covered diverse applications, including mandibular reconstruction, orthognathic surgery, and cranioplasty. Quality assessment revealed methodological heterogeneity, as all studies used patient-specific or anatomically accurate models, but critical best practices have been inconsistently applied. Only one study reported a mesh convergence analysis, while none of the studies performed an experimental validation of their FEA biomechanical predictions. The overall risk of bias was rated moderate to high. Certainty of evidence for any biomechanical outcome was very low according to GRADE. Saudi-based FEA research on maxillofacial surgery is sparse and methodologically nascent. Although technical capabilities in model generation exist, critical gaps in numerical verification (mesh convergence) and experimental validation limit the reliability and translational potential of the findings, underscoring the need to establish standardized, high-quality research protocols to advance data-driven surgical planning in Saudi Arabia.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SA), King Abdullah Medical City (SA), Al Baha University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.