Correlating luminescence and single-molecule magnetism for two series of heteroleptic lanthanoid complexes

In the development of multifunctional materials, symmetry selection rules often exert opposing influences on luminescence and magnetic memory performance. For lanthanoid single-molecule magnets (SMMs), large crystal field splitting or high-symmetry environments are generally advantageous, as they suppress wavefunction mixing and minimize fast relaxation pathways-both essential for achieving slow magnetic relaxation. Conversely, these same selection rules often hinder luminescence in lanthanoid complexes, resulting in low quantum yields and frequently necessitating the use of the antenna effect, in which excitation occurs <i>via</i> a coordinating ligand. Here we report the subtle influence of ligand substitution in the related families of lanthanoid complexes: [Ln(tpa)(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (1-Ln) and [Ln(tpa)Cl<sub>3</sub>] (2-Ln) (tpa = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine; Ln = Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb). Despite the change in ligands, similar pseudo-symmetries are found for both 1-Ln and 2-Ln, yielding closest agreement to the <i>C</i><sub>3</sub> point group. In-field slow magnetic relaxation is observed for 1-Gd, 2-Gd, 2-Dy, 1-Yb and 2-Yb<i>via</i> ac magnetic susceptibility studies. Slower magnetic relaxation is found for 2-Gd and 2-Yb relative to their corresponding counterparts with computational studies validating larger crystal field splitting and increased ground state purity for 2-Yb and 2-Dy, consistent with the observed behaviour. Interestingly, the highly mixed ground state wavefunction for 1-Dy correlates with the absence of SMM behaviour, owing to the bidentate nature of the nitrato ligands, shifting ligand donor atoms away from the ideal axial position. The luminescence spectra for 1-Eu and 2-Eu both display splitting patterns of the <sup>5</sup>D<sub>0</sub> → <sup>7</sup>F<sub><i>J</i></sub> peaks consistent with a trigonal coordination environment. The luminescence decays indicate longer lifetimes for 1-Eu, which is ascribed to enhanced non-radiative decay for 2-Eu, following determination of similar radiative lifetime values for both complexes. This study highlights how subtle variations in lanthanoid coordination symmetry modulate both SMM and luminescence properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dalton Transactions
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5dt02364e
Primary Topic
Magnetism in coordination complexes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlating luminescence and single-molecule magnetism for two series of heteroleptic lanthanoid complexes

Moya A. Hay, Dallerba Elena, Massimiliano Massi, Marcus J. Giansiracusa et al.
Dalton Transactions
Magnetism in coordination complexes
article

Correlating luminescence and single-molecule magnetism for two series of heteroleptic lanthanoid complexes

Moya A. Hay, Dallerba Elena, Massimiliano Massi, Marcus J. Giansiracusa, Colette Boskovic, Jonay Gonzalez, Christopher R. Hall, Vinicius Fagundes
article en

Abstract

In the development of multifunctional materials, symmetry selection rules often exert opposing influences on luminescence and magnetic memory performance. For lanthanoid single-molecule magnets (SMMs), large crystal field splitting or high-symmetry environments are generally advantageous, as they suppress wavefunction mixing and minimize fast relaxation pathways-both essential for achieving slow magnetic relaxation. Conversely, these same selection rules often hinder luminescence in lanthanoid complexes, resulting in low quantum yields and frequently necessitating the use of the antenna effect, in which excitation occurs <i>via</i> a coordinating ligand. Here we report the subtle influence of ligand substitution in the related families of lanthanoid complexes: [Ln(tpa)(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (1-Ln) and [Ln(tpa)Cl<sub>3</sub>] (2-Ln) (tpa = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine; Ln = Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb). Despite the change in ligands, similar pseudo-symmetries are found for both 1-Ln and 2-Ln, yielding closest agreement to the <i>C</i><sub>3</sub> point group. In-field slow magnetic relaxation is observed for 1-Gd, 2-Gd, 2-Dy, 1-Yb and 2-Yb<i>via</i> ac magnetic susceptibility studies. Slower magnetic relaxation is found for 2-Gd and 2-Yb relative to their corresponding counterparts with computational studies validating larger crystal field splitting and increased ground state purity for 2-Yb and 2-Dy, consistent with the observed behaviour. Interestingly, the highly mixed ground state wavefunction for 1-Dy correlates with the absence of SMM behaviour, owing to the bidentate nature of the nitrato ligands, shifting ligand donor atoms away from the ideal axial position. The luminescence spectra for 1-Eu and 2-Eu both display splitting patterns of the <sup>5</sup>D<sub>0</sub> → <sup>7</sup>F<sub><i>J</i></sub> peaks consistent with a trigonal coordination environment. The luminescence decays indicate longer lifetimes for 1-Eu, which is ascribed to enhanced non-radiative decay for 2-Eu, following determination of similar radiative lifetime values for both complexes. This study highlights how subtle variations in lanthanoid coordination symmetry modulate both SMM and luminescence properties.

Dalton TransactionsVol. 55(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Magnetism in coordination complexes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.