Patient perspectives on the supervision of orthodontic retention

INTRODUCTION The NHS contract dictates that orthodontic treatment providers supervise retention for 12 months. Typical protocols involve multiple face-to-face appointments during this period. The aim of this study was to explore the views of patients on the current and future direction of supervising retention. METHODS A local questionnaire was developed to assess patients’ perspectives on current review protocols and their associated burden, and the potential for alternative modes of review. Questionnaires were completed by 50 consecutive patients with removable retainers attending for review between May and July 2024. RESULTS Patients generally felt that retainer review appointments were important (90%). However, the burden of travelling to appointments meant that a quarter (28%) of patients estimated that this would result in missing more than 2 hours of education or employment. A majority (56%) of patients wanted other means of review to be offered. In particular, university students faced the largest burden of attending appointments and expressed the greatest desire for other modes of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Accounting for patient lifestyle factors and the burden of attending appointments should supplement clinical aspects in determining the review protocols utilised. Further research investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes with alternative supervision protocols is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Faculty Dental Journal
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2026.8
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient perspectives on the supervision of orthodontic retention

Gavin Mack, Samuel Reeves
Faculty Dental Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Patient perspectives on the supervision of orthodontic retention

Gavin Mack, Samuel Reeves
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The NHS contract dictates that orthodontic treatment providers supervise retention for 12 months. Typical protocols involve multiple face-to-face appointments during this period. The aim of this study was to explore the views of patients on the current and future direction of supervising retention. METHODS A local questionnaire was developed to assess patients’ perspectives on current review protocols and their associated burden, and the potential for alternative modes of review. Questionnaires were completed by 50 consecutive patients with removable retainers attending for review between May and July 2024. RESULTS Patients generally felt that retainer review appointments were important (90%). However, the burden of travelling to appointments meant that a quarter (28%) of patients estimated that this would result in missing more than 2 hours of education or employment. A majority (56%) of patients wanted other means of review to be offered. In particular, university students faced the largest burden of attending appointments and expressed the greatest desire for other modes of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Accounting for patient lifestyle factors and the burden of attending appointments should supplement clinical aspects in determining the review protocols utilised. Further research investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes with alternative supervision protocols is required.

Faculty Dental JournalVol. 17(1)
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient perspectives on the supervision of orthodontic retention — Gavin Mack, Samuel Reeves · Faculty Dental Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS