Implementing incentives in family medicine for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment

Patient and staff feedback was well-aligned, especially regarding rewards as an opportunity for staff-patient connection and the need for simplicity. Comparing end-user suggestions with the literature, some consensus suggestions (e.g. non-escalating rewards) highlighted feasible places to compromise on ideal effectiveness to gain implementability. However, others (e.g. use of self-report to verify goals) conflicted directly with CM principles and indicate where more intensive education, support, and monitoring will be needed for implementation fidelity. These findings inform user-centered design and iteration of an incentive program for this accessible, non-specialized family medicine setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00621-7
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing incentives in family medicine for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment

Margaret C. Wardle, Samantha Ellis, Sungha Kang, Nathan Stackhouse et al.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Implementing incentives in family medicine for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment

Margaret C. Wardle, Samantha Ellis, Sungha Kang, Nathan Stackhouse, Brittany N. Rudd, Tondalaya Henry, Alexandra R. Tabachnick, Jax Witzig, Diego Basaldu, Nicole Gastala
article en

Abstract

Patient and staff feedback was well-aligned, especially regarding rewards as an opportunity for staff-patient connection and the need for simplicity. Comparing end-user suggestions with the literature, some consensus suggestions (e.g. non-escalating rewards) highlighted feasible places to compromise on ideal effectiveness to gain implementability. However, others (e.g. use of self-report to verify goals) conflicted directly with CM principles and indicate where more intensive education, support, and monitoring will be needed for implementation fidelity. These findings inform user-centered design and iteration of an incentive program for this accessible, non-specialized family medicine setting.

Addiction Science & Clinical PracticeVol. 20(1)
Northwestern University (US), Illinois College (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Michigan State University (US)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois at Chicago
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementing incentives in family medicine for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment — Margaret C. Wardle, Samantha Ellis, et al. · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS