A review of integrated pest management practices in high tunnel specialty crop production

High tunnels are a unique hybrid system of open field and greenhouse agriculture. As a result, pest dynamics and appropriate control methods differ from non-high tunnel environments. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current peer-reviewed research regarding arthropod pests and pest management techniques in high tunnels. We examine how pest populations compare between high tunnels and other forms of crop production and discuss how high tunnel conditions, such as seasonality and tunnel material, affect arthropod behavior. We look at the current knowledge of integrated pest management (IPM) practices in high tunnels, including monitoring methods, economic thresholds, cultural control, biological control, and chemical control. Research on monitoring methods and economic thresholds in high tunnels is limited. Current cultural control methods primarily include using banker plants and companion plants to attract natural enemies and insect exclusion netting to prevent the entrance of insect pests. Companion planting of cut flowers and wildflowers encourage natural enemy residence, but the efficacy of banker plants and exclusion netting is mixed. Biological control in high tunnels can be successful in managing common pests, such as Tetranychus urticae, Frankliniella occidentalis, and Bemisia tabaci ; however, extreme temperatures in high tunnels can limit the efficacy of natural enemies. Chemical control research shows that pesticides are often needed in high tunnels due to high pest pressure and have a slower degradation rate in high tunnels than in open field agriculture. Ultimately, considerably more research is needed on potential IPM for arthropod control that would fit growers' needs. • High tunnels alter arthropod behavior and pest management efficacy • There is a gap in knowledge of monitoring and economic thresholds in high tunnels • Cultural control tactics rely on companion planting or exclusion • Biological control implementation is challenging and control success is variable • Chemical residues can be higher in high tunnels presenting safety concerns

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Protection
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107530
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of integrated pest management practices in high tunnel specialty crop production

Laura L. Ingwell, Kacie J. Athey, Eleanor L. Meys, Garima Kohli et al.
Crop Protection
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

A review of integrated pest management practices in high tunnel specialty crop production

Laura L. Ingwell, Kacie J. Athey, Eleanor L. Meys, Garima Kohli, Samantha A. Willden
article en

Abstract

High tunnels are a unique hybrid system of open field and greenhouse agriculture. As a result, pest dynamics and appropriate control methods differ from non-high tunnel environments. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current peer-reviewed research regarding arthropod pests and pest management techniques in high tunnels. We examine how pest populations compare between high tunnels and other forms of crop production and discuss how high tunnel conditions, such as seasonality and tunnel material, affect arthropod behavior. We look at the current knowledge of integrated pest management (IPM) practices in high tunnels, including monitoring methods, economic thresholds, cultural control, biological control, and chemical control. Research on monitoring methods and economic thresholds in high tunnels is limited. Current cultural control methods primarily include using banker plants and companion plants to attract natural enemies and insect exclusion netting to prevent the entrance of insect pests. Companion planting of cut flowers and wildflowers encourage natural enemy residence, but the efficacy of banker plants and exclusion netting is mixed. Biological control in high tunnels can be successful in managing common pests, such as Tetranychus urticae, Frankliniella occidentalis, and Bemisia tabaci ; however, extreme temperatures in high tunnels can limit the efficacy of natural enemies. Chemical control research shows that pesticides are often needed in high tunnels due to high pest pressure and have a slower degradation rate in high tunnels than in open field agriculture. Ultimately, considerably more research is needed on potential IPM for arthropod control that would fit growers' needs. • High tunnels alter arthropod behavior and pest management efficacy • There is a gap in knowledge of monitoring and economic thresholds in high tunnels • Cultural control tactics rely on companion planting or exclusion • Biological control implementation is challenging and control success is variable • Chemical residues can be higher in high tunnels presenting safety concerns

Crop ProtectionVol. 202
Boston University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Cornell University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.