Evaluation framework related to metadata extraction from scientific publications

This dataset provides the evaluation framework used in a systematic literature review of methods for extracting and aligning data from tables and charts in scientific publications. The evaluation framework captures structured annotations for 68 peer-reviewed studies, covering tasks, modalities (tables, charts, multimodal), benchmarks, models, architectures, evaluation metrics, and support for variable identification, alignment, and reconstruction. The evaluation framework is designed to support reproducibility, comparative analysis, and meta-research on multimodal document understanding. It enables quantitative and qualitative analysis of trends, open challenges, and methodological gaps in table and chart extraction, including multimodal alignment, variable and value association, and benchmark reuse. This resource can be reused by researchers developing extraction systems, benchmarking multimodal models, or studying the state of the art in scientific document analysis, particularly in the context of structured data extraction from tables and charts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18007422
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation framework related to metadata extraction from scientific publications

Daniel Garijo, Erick Cedeño
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

Evaluation framework related to metadata extraction from scientific publications

Daniel Garijo, Erick Cedeño
article en

Abstract

This dataset provides the evaluation framework used in a systematic literature review of methods for extracting and aligning data from tables and charts in scientific publications. The evaluation framework captures structured annotations for 68 peer-reviewed studies, covering tasks, modalities (tables, charts, multimodal), benchmarks, models, architectures, evaluation metrics, and support for variable identification, alignment, and reconstruction. The evaluation framework is designed to support reproducibility, comparative analysis, and meta-research on multimodal document understanding. It enables quantitative and qualitative analysis of trends, open challenges, and methodological gaps in table and chart extraction, including multimodal alignment, variable and value association, and benchmark reuse. This resource can be reused by researchers developing extraction systems, benchmarking multimodal models, or studying the state of the art in scientific document analysis, particularly in the context of structured data extraction from tables and charts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Southern California (US), California Southern University (US), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation framework related to metadata extraction from scientific publications — Daniel Garijo, Erick Cedeño · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS