Reverse engineering and innovation: empirical evidence from firm-level data

Abstract Reverse engineering (RE) allows firms to learn about critical components and design features of competitors’ technologies. From an innovation strategy point of view, relying on RE involves a trade-off between acquiring others’ knowledge rather cheap and quickly, and being trapped into a follower strategy that rests on technology developments propelled by other firms. This paper aims to explore which type of firms use RE, and which type of innovation results from an RE-based knowledge acquisition strategy. Using data from the German part of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), we find that RE is more often used by firms that operate under fierce price competition and have stronger financial constraints. RE using firms obtain higher product innovation output compared to firms with other knowledge acquisition strategies, though their innovations have a low degree of novelty (i.e., imitations). The market success of these innovations seem to rest on a price advantage, based on higher cost savings from process innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10309-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reverse engineering and innovation: empirical evidence from firm-level data

Christian Rammer, Kornelius Kraft
1 citations
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
article

Reverse engineering and innovation: empirical evidence from firm-level data

Christian Rammer, Kornelius Kraft
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Reverse engineering (RE) allows firms to learn about critical components and design features of competitors’ technologies. From an innovation strategy point of view, relying on RE involves a trade-off between acquiring others’ knowledge rather cheap and quickly, and being trapped into a follower strategy that rests on technology developments propelled by other firms. This paper aims to explore which type of firms use RE, and which type of innovation results from an RE-based knowledge acquisition strategy. Using data from the German part of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), we find that RE is more often used by firms that operate under fierce price competition and have stronger financial constraints. RE using firms obtain higher product innovation output compared to firms with other knowledge acquisition strategies, though their innovations have a low degree of novelty (i.e., imitations). The market success of these innovations seem to rest on a price advantage, based on higher cost savings from process innovation.

The Journal of Technology Transfer
Centre for European Economic Research (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.