Congressional Earmarks and Credit Claiming in a Partisan Era

In 2021, congressional Democrats brought back earmarks. Proponents of earmarks argue that they can help members of Congress in their quest for reelection by giving them crucial credit claiming fodder, and as a result can help build support for legislation by adding particularistic benefits to legislative packages. Earlier research provides some support for these arguments, but changes to American politics over the last few decades call into question whether past research on the electoral benefits of earmarks holds today. This paper presents the results of two original survey experiments that seek to test the electoral benefits of earmarks. Our results suggest that earmarks have only a limited impact on public attitudes toward lawmakers. In particular, credit claiming around earmarks only appears to improve the support among political independents, and some cross-partisan voters. However, taking an anti-earmark stance seems most helpful in winning the approval of self-identifying Republicans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x251409670
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Congressional Earmarks and Credit Claiming in a Partisan Era

James M. Curry, Steven Sylvester
American Politics Research
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

Congressional Earmarks and Credit Claiming in a Partisan Era

James M. Curry, Steven Sylvester
article en

Abstract

In 2021, congressional Democrats brought back earmarks. Proponents of earmarks argue that they can help members of Congress in their quest for reelection by giving them crucial credit claiming fodder, and as a result can help build support for legislation by adding particularistic benefits to legislative packages. Earlier research provides some support for these arguments, but changes to American politics over the last few decades call into question whether past research on the electoral benefits of earmarks holds today. This paper presents the results of two original survey experiments that seek to test the electoral benefits of earmarks. Our results suggest that earmarks have only a limited impact on public attitudes toward lawmakers. In particular, credit claiming around earmarks only appears to improve the support among political independents, and some cross-partisan voters. However, taking an anti-earmark stance seems most helpful in winning the approval of self-identifying Republicans.

American Politics ResearchVol. 54(2)
University of Notre Dame (US), Utah Valley University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Congressional Earmarks and Credit Claiming in a Partisan Era — James M. Curry, Steven Sylvester · American Politics Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS