Comparative Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients Aged Below and Above 65 Years: A Single-Center Experience

Despite the increasing prevalence of advanced heart failure among older patients, current guidelines remain cautious regarding the safety of heart transplantation (HT) in elderly recipients. This study aimed to evaluate early and late outcomes in older HT recipients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent HT at our center between January 2012 and December 2022, comparing early and late outcomes of recipients ≥65 years (group 1) vs. those <65 (group 2). Groups 1 and 2 comprised 73 (female = 10, median age = 67 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 66-69) and 212 patients (female = 58, median age = 54 years, IQR = 46-60), respectively. Group 1 presented a higher burden of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and impaired renal function (p < 0.001); additionally, they more often received older donors (p < 0.001) with a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.041). Group 1 experienced a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality (n = 21, 28.8%; p < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (IQR = 1.3-6.9), group 1 showed lower survival rates (p < 0.001) (1 year = 68%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 58-80; 5 year = 62%, 95% CI = 51-74). In our experience, HT in patients aged ≥65 years shows worse early and late outcomes; however, among elderly recipients, modifiable factors such as donor age and perioperative complications significantly influence survival and may be targeted to improve clinical results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002628
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients Aged Below and Above 65 Years: A Single-Center Experience

Chiara Tessari, M. Fedrigo, G. Toscano, Vincenzo Tarzia et al.
1 citations
ASAIO Journal
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Comparative Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients Aged Below and Above 65 Years: A Single-Center Experience

Chiara Tessari, M. Fedrigo, G. Toscano, Vincenzo Tarzia, Veronica Geatti, Tea Lena, Nicola Pradegan, Giulia Lorenzoni, Giorgia Guerra, Gino Gerosa, Valentina Lombardi, Annalisa Angelini, Dario Gregori
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the increasing prevalence of advanced heart failure among older patients, current guidelines remain cautious regarding the safety of heart transplantation (HT) in elderly recipients. This study aimed to evaluate early and late outcomes in older HT recipients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent HT at our center between January 2012 and December 2022, comparing early and late outcomes of recipients ≥65 years (group 1) vs. those <65 (group 2). Groups 1 and 2 comprised 73 (female = 10, median age = 67 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 66-69) and 212 patients (female = 58, median age = 54 years, IQR = 46-60), respectively. Group 1 presented a higher burden of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and impaired renal function (p < 0.001); additionally, they more often received older donors (p < 0.001) with a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.041). Group 1 experienced a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality (n = 21, 28.8%; p < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (IQR = 1.3-6.9), group 1 showed lower survival rates (p < 0.001) (1 year = 68%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 58-80; 5 year = 62%, 95% CI = 51-74). In our experience, HT in patients aged ≥65 years shows worse early and late outcomes; however, among elderly recipients, modifiable factors such as donor age and perioperative complications significantly influence survival and may be targeted to improve clinical results.

ASAIO Journal
University of Padua (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.