Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region –A systematic review and meta-analysis

To review anatomical considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). A systematic electronic literature search was conducted independently by two reviewers across PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus and Cochrane databases, supplemented by a manual search, to identify eligible clinical studies published from 2006 up to October 2024. Studies evaluating anatomical parameters relevant to implant placement were included. From 1,151 records,12 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,834 patients who received immediate implants in the mandibular posterior region. The meta-analysis showed that the mean distance between the root apex and the inferior alveolar canal was 5.14 mm for premolars, 6.32 mm for first molars, and 4.65 mm for second molars. Undercut ridge morphology was most prevalent at the second molar site (73%), posing a higher risk for lingual plate perforation. Immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region requires careful anatomical assessment, with particular attention to the distance from the inferior alveolar canal and the potential risk of lingual plate perforation, to optimize treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06861-y
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region –A systematic review and meta-analysis

Romina Meshkinnejad, Zohreh Afshari, Mahsa Ahmadishadmehri, Parichehr Behfarnia
BMC Oral Health
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region –A systematic review and meta-analysis

Romina Meshkinnejad, Zohreh Afshari, Mahsa Ahmadishadmehri, Parichehr Behfarnia
article en

Abstract

To review anatomical considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). A systematic electronic literature search was conducted independently by two reviewers across PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus and Cochrane databases, supplemented by a manual search, to identify eligible clinical studies published from 2006 up to October 2024. Studies evaluating anatomical parameters relevant to implant placement were included. From 1,151 records,12 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,834 patients who received immediate implants in the mandibular posterior region. The meta-analysis showed that the mean distance between the root apex and the inferior alveolar canal was 5.14 mm for premolars, 6.32 mm for first molars, and 4.65 mm for second molars. Undercut ridge morphology was most prevalent at the second molar site (73%), posing a higher risk for lingual plate perforation. Immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region requires careful anatomical assessment, with particular attention to the distance from the inferior alveolar canal and the potential risk of lingual plate perforation, to optimize treatment outcomes.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 25(1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.