Exploring assessment measures including psychological aspects in adults with acquired Peripheral Facial Palsy (PFP): a scoping review

Given the lack of specific assessment measures and consensus on how to evaluate the psychological aspects of acquired peripheral facial palsy, this study aimed to identify the existing instruments in current use, as well as the key psychological domains considered. A secondary objective was to identify mental health-related areas not addressed or under-represented by those instruments. A scoping review was conducted to identify assessment measures, their underlying dimensions, and frequency of use. Findings were thematically synthesized across specific areas and grouped by consensus among the three authors to identify key domains for evaluating facial palsy. 46 instruments were identified, also capturing social and quality-of-life aspects often closely linked to psychological factors. Their dimensions were classified into five generic areas: health-related quality of life perception, symptomatology (emotional and physical), appearance-related matters, intrapersonal and social skills, and care experience. Analysis of the items led to the identification of specific areas, which were classified by relevance into six broader psychosocial domains: (1) social functioning, (2) emotional symptomatology, (3) facial palsy- related QoL, (4) general health-related QoL, (5) psychological functioning, and (6) care experience-satisfaction. The FDI, FaCE, followed by the SF-36, and HADS emerged as the most used instruments. The results showed a lack of consensus due to the heterogeneity of the instruments retrieved for the evaluation of psychological outcomes. This review identified under-represented psychological areas, such as social and appearance-related anxiety, body self-perception, and experience of the care process which may warrant further evaluation. Several of the instruments retrieved were general rather than facial palsy-specific, which could not fully address the specific psychological needs of adults suffering with acquired peripheral facial palsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02455-y
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring assessment measures including psychological aspects in adults with acquired Peripheral Facial Palsy (PFP): a scoping review

Patricia Peñas, Rocío Polanco-Fernández, Ioseba Iraurgi
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

Exploring assessment measures including psychological aspects in adults with acquired Peripheral Facial Palsy (PFP): a scoping review

Patricia Peñas, Rocío Polanco-Fernández, Ioseba Iraurgi
article en

Abstract

Given the lack of specific assessment measures and consensus on how to evaluate the psychological aspects of acquired peripheral facial palsy, this study aimed to identify the existing instruments in current use, as well as the key psychological domains considered. A secondary objective was to identify mental health-related areas not addressed or under-represented by those instruments. A scoping review was conducted to identify assessment measures, their underlying dimensions, and frequency of use. Findings were thematically synthesized across specific areas and grouped by consensus among the three authors to identify key domains for evaluating facial palsy. 46 instruments were identified, also capturing social and quality-of-life aspects often closely linked to psychological factors. Their dimensions were classified into five generic areas: health-related quality of life perception, symptomatology (emotional and physical), appearance-related matters, intrapersonal and social skills, and care experience. Analysis of the items led to the identification of specific areas, which were classified by relevance into six broader psychosocial domains: (1) social functioning, (2) emotional symptomatology, (3) facial palsy- related QoL, (4) general health-related QoL, (5) psychological functioning, and (6) care experience-satisfaction. The FDI, FaCE, followed by the SF-36, and HADS emerged as the most used instruments. The results showed a lack of consensus due to the heterogeneity of the instruments retrieved for the evaluation of psychological outcomes. This review identified under-represented psychological areas, such as social and appearance-related anxiety, body self-perception, and experience of the care process which may warrant further evaluation. Several of the instruments retrieved were general rather than facial palsy-specific, which could not fully address the specific psychological needs of adults suffering with acquired peripheral facial palsy.

Health and Quality of Life OutcomesVol. 23(1)
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.