Field notes from the margins: Rethinking ethnographic presence through interpretive transcription and online interviewing

This article draws on a multi-sited study involving 307 interviews with labeled youth across Europe to argue that methodological improvisations can deepen, rather than dilute, ethnographic practice. Confronted with limited access, what began as a practical decision (to forgo audio recording and go online) quickly evolved into a methodological provocation. Rather than treating these adaptations as compromises, we demonstrate how they enhanced trust, protected participant anonymity, and enabled rich, context-sensitive data collection. Through vivid tales from the field, we show how non-recorded, hand-written transcriptions preserved the emotional and narrative depth of interviews, while virtual platforms expanded access without sacrificing rapport. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions about rigor in research and argue for a more flexible, ethically attuned ethnographic practice. We conclude by offering practical recommendations for conducting fieldwork with hard-to-reach populations and suggest that, under the right conditions, methodological departures from tradition can generate meaningful insights and deepen researchers’ accountability to their participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnography
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381251408271
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field notes from the margins: Rethinking ethnographic presence through interpretive transcription and online interviewing

Ayşenur Benevento
Ethnography
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Field notes from the margins: Rethinking ethnographic presence through interpretive transcription and online interviewing

Ayşenur Benevento
article en

Abstract

This article draws on a multi-sited study involving 307 interviews with labeled youth across Europe to argue that methodological improvisations can deepen, rather than dilute, ethnographic practice. Confronted with limited access, what began as a practical decision (to forgo audio recording and go online) quickly evolved into a methodological provocation. Rather than treating these adaptations as compromises, we demonstrate how they enhanced trust, protected participant anonymity, and enabled rich, context-sensitive data collection. Through vivid tales from the field, we show how non-recorded, hand-written transcriptions preserved the emotional and narrative depth of interviews, while virtual platforms expanded access without sacrificing rapport. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions about rigor in research and argue for a more flexible, ethically attuned ethnographic practice. We conclude by offering practical recommendations for conducting fieldwork with hard-to-reach populations and suggest that, under the right conditions, methodological departures from tradition can generate meaningful insights and deepen researchers’ accountability to their participants.

Ethnography
Bahçeşehir University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Field notes from the margins: Rethinking ethnographic presence through interpretive transcription and online interviewing — Ayşenur Benevento · Ethnography (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS