Divergent Phosphorus‐Mining Strategies in Simple and Compound Cluster Roots in Extremely Phosphorus‐Impoverished Soils in Southwest Australia

Most Proteaceae and some Fabaceae species produce specialised cluster roots (CRs), and are abundant in severely phosphorus (P)-impoverished soils in southwest Australia. Two types of CRs, compound and simple, have been identified. However, the difference in their P-mining strategies remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted glasshouse and field experiments to compare the P-acquisition strategies among 18 CR-producing species in Proteaceae and Fabaceae. Proteaceae produced a significantly larger mass of CRs than Fabaceae. Particularly, Banksia species produced the largest mass of compound CRs and exhibited the greatest net plant-absorbed P in pots and consistently higher mature leaf manganese concentration in the field. In contrast, Hakea and Grevillea species produced less mass of simple CRs but three times as much soil adhered to their CRs per CR dry weight, resulting in greater absorbed P per CR weight. All plants depleted similar P compounds from soil and accessed c. 52% of P that was not extracted by a NaOH-EDTA solution, suggesting that both CRs shared a common physiological function for mining scarcely available P. This study highlights two divergent P-acquisition strategies: greater biomass investment in compound CRs versus greater P-acquisition efficiency in simple CRs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Cell & Environment
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70334
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent Phosphorus‐Mining Strategies in Simple and Compound Cluster Roots in Extremely Phosphorus‐Impoverished Soils in Southwest Australia

Erik J. Veneklaas, Clément E. Gille, Hirotsuna Yamada, Gareth L. Nealon et al.
Plant Cell & Environment
Phosphorus and nutrient management
article

Divergent Phosphorus‐Mining Strategies in Simple and Compound Cluster Roots in Extremely Phosphorus‐Impoverished Soils in Southwest Australia

Erik J. Veneklaas, Clément E. Gille, Hirotsuna Yamada, Gareth L. Nealon, Jun WASAKI, L. Yan, Hans Lambers, Pallavi
article en

Abstract

Most Proteaceae and some Fabaceae species produce specialised cluster roots (CRs), and are abundant in severely phosphorus (P)-impoverished soils in southwest Australia. Two types of CRs, compound and simple, have been identified. However, the difference in their P-mining strategies remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted glasshouse and field experiments to compare the P-acquisition strategies among 18 CR-producing species in Proteaceae and Fabaceae. Proteaceae produced a significantly larger mass of CRs than Fabaceae. Particularly, Banksia species produced the largest mass of compound CRs and exhibited the greatest net plant-absorbed P in pots and consistently higher mature leaf manganese concentration in the field. In contrast, Hakea and Grevillea species produced less mass of simple CRs but three times as much soil adhered to their CRs per CR dry weight, resulting in greater absorbed P per CR weight. All plants depleted similar P compounds from soil and accessed c. 52% of P that was not extracted by a NaOH-EDTA solution, suggesting that both CRs shared a common physiological function for mining scarcely available P. This study highlights two divergent P-acquisition strategies: greater biomass investment in compound CRs versus greater P-acquisition efficiency in simple CRs.

Plant Cell & EnvironmentVol. 49(4)
Hiroshima University (JP), Universität Hamburg (DE), The University of Western Australia (AU), Beijing Forestry University (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Northeast Forestry University, Xiamen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.