How to break the mold: Re-imagining multimodal organization and management studies

In this essay, we take the burgeoning scholarship on multimodal approaches to the study of organization and management as our point of departure to explore substantial limitations hindering a genuinely multimodal understanding within our discipline. We problematize how existing academic conventions : (a) limit our research agenda and the choice of relevant phenomena, topics, research questions, and empirical designs; (b) restrict the conceptual and empirical toolbox within the research process , restricting researchers’ ability to explore and exploit opportunities afforded by multimodality; and (c) narrow down the channels for scholarly communication , including the distribution of findings and knowledge transfer. Subsequently, we outline three promising “shifts”—toward research as a creative endeavor , toward research as an encounter , and toward research as a material practice —that we believe may successfully pave the way to fully harness the potential of multimodality in our field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084251396788
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to break the mold: Re-imagining multimodal organization and management studies

Maria Laura Toraldo, Dennis Jancsary, Markus A. Höllerer, Gianluigi Mangia et al.
1 citations
Organization
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
article

How to break the mold: Re-imagining multimodal organization and management studies

Maria Laura Toraldo, Dennis Jancsary, Markus A. Höllerer, Gianluigi Mangia, Renate E. Meyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this essay, we take the burgeoning scholarship on multimodal approaches to the study of organization and management as our point of departure to explore substantial limitations hindering a genuinely multimodal understanding within our discipline. We problematize how existing academic conventions : (a) limit our research agenda and the choice of relevant phenomena, topics, research questions, and empirical designs; (b) restrict the conceptual and empirical toolbox within the research process , restricting researchers’ ability to explore and exploit opportunities afforded by multimodality; and (c) narrow down the channels for scholarly communication , including the distribution of findings and knowledge transfer. Subsequently, we outline three promising “shifts”—toward research as a creative endeavor , toward research as an encounter , and toward research as a material practice —that we believe may successfully pave the way to fully harness the potential of multimodality in our field.

Organization
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), University of Liverpool (GB), Copenhagen Business School (DK), University of Milan (IT), UNSW Sydney (AU), Scuola Nazionale dell'Amministrazione (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.