Generative AI Health Assistants in Modern Healthcare: Drivers and Barriers to Adoption

Abstract Generative AI Health Assistants (GAIHAs) are transforming patient engagement in modern healthcare by providing personalized support and medical information. Despite the rapid growth in the number of GAIHAs and the technologies that integrate them, patient adoption remains uncertain. This uncertainty highlights the need for a deeper exploration of the factors influencing their acceptance and adoption as well as the barriers that limit widespread use. Traditional models, like the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), primarily emphasize adoption drivers such as usefulness and ease of use while overlooking barriers such as privacy concerns and resistance to change. Other models such as the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) include social influence but limit scope to workplace expectations, neglecting broader social dynamics that are relevant in consumer-driven contexts like healthcare. This study investigates the drivers of GAIHA adoption through a new framework, EVF-DOI-IB, which integrates the Extended Valence Framework (EVF), the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory, and Innovation Barriers (IB). The proposed framework builds on the core constructs of trust, risk, benefit, and intention from EVF, and extends them with additional antecedents. The new framework also incorporates innovation drivers from the DOI perspective, namely relative advantage, trialability, and interpersonal communication. Finally, the new framework includes the innovation barriers resistance to change and privacy concerns. The results from a quantitative analysis of our survey data reveal that trust and perceived benefits strongly predict adoption intentions while resistance to change and privacy concerns heighten perceived risks. The findings also show that interpersonal communication and relative advantages play vital roles in reinforcing trust. Our research contributes to the body of knowledge in that it expands EVF’s application to the domain of healthcare AI technologies and provides actionable recommendations for developers and healthcare providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10681-4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI Health Assistants in Modern Healthcare: Drivers and Barriers to Adoption

James Smith, Mark A. Harris, Amita Goyal Chin, Zainab Al-Lataifeh
Information Systems Frontiers
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI Health Assistants in Modern Healthcare: Drivers and Barriers to Adoption

James Smith, Mark A. Harris, Amita Goyal Chin, Zainab Al-Lataifeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generative AI Health Assistants (GAIHAs) are transforming patient engagement in modern healthcare by providing personalized support and medical information. Despite the rapid growth in the number of GAIHAs and the technologies that integrate them, patient adoption remains uncertain. This uncertainty highlights the need for a deeper exploration of the factors influencing their acceptance and adoption as well as the barriers that limit widespread use. Traditional models, like the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), primarily emphasize adoption drivers such as usefulness and ease of use while overlooking barriers such as privacy concerns and resistance to change. Other models such as the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) include social influence but limit scope to workplace expectations, neglecting broader social dynamics that are relevant in consumer-driven contexts like healthcare. This study investigates the drivers of GAIHA adoption through a new framework, EVF-DOI-IB, which integrates the Extended Valence Framework (EVF), the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory, and Innovation Barriers (IB). The proposed framework builds on the core constructs of trust, risk, benefit, and intention from EVF, and extends them with additional antecedents. The new framework also incorporates innovation drivers from the DOI perspective, namely relative advantage, trialability, and interpersonal communication. Finally, the new framework includes the innovation barriers resistance to change and privacy concerns. The results from a quantitative analysis of our survey data reveal that trust and perceived benefits strongly predict adoption intentions while resistance to change and privacy concerns heighten perceived risks. The findings also show that interpersonal communication and relative advantages play vital roles in reinforcing trust. Our research contributes to the body of knowledge in that it expands EVF’s application to the domain of healthcare AI technologies and provides actionable recommendations for developers and healthcare providers.

Information Systems FrontiersVol. 28(1)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Augusta University Health (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.