God’s Scrutiny, Divine Anonymity, and the Reception of Social Action

Building on Thomas DeGloma’s book Anonymous: The Performance of Hidden Identities (2023), to further explore the subject of anonymity, in this paper I elaborate on its connections with the themes of God and the divine. I open with a discussion of two “impossibilities”: to act undercover in the sight of almighty entities and to identify such almighty entities. Therefore, I examine the fragility of anonymous performances to underscore how the anticipation of exposure can make them less free (in a way, less anonymous) as well as abundant, since the allure of investigation often drives engagement. I then shift to the node of “impossible identification”, addressing how certain forms of ultimate authority remain deliberately faceless to absorb blame, deflect praise, and facilitate the public misattribution of both. I conclude by emphasizing the role of the audience in shaping social behavior, linking anonymity to the broader category of reaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologica
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/22886
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

God’s Scrutiny, Divine Anonymity, and the Reception of Social Action

Lorenzo Sabetta
Sociologica
Religion and Society Interactions
article

God’s Scrutiny, Divine Anonymity, and the Reception of Social Action

Lorenzo Sabetta
article en

Abstract

Building on Thomas DeGloma’s book Anonymous: The Performance of Hidden Identities (2023), to further explore the subject of anonymity, in this paper I elaborate on its connections with the themes of God and the divine. I open with a discussion of two “impossibilities”: to act undercover in the sight of almighty entities and to identify such almighty entities. Therefore, I examine the fragility of anonymous performances to underscore how the anticipation of exposure can make them less free (in a way, less anonymous) as well as abundant, since the allure of investigation often drives engagement. I then shift to the node of “impossible identification”, addressing how certain forms of ultimate authority remain deliberately faceless to absorb blame, deflect praise, and facilitate the public misattribution of both. I conclude by emphasizing the role of the audience in shaping social behavior, linking anonymity to the broader category of reaction.

SociologicaVol. 19(3)
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.