East-West risk connectedness in the European banking sector

This study examines the risk spillover dynamics between banks in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Western Europe (WE) across 30 banking groups from 2014 to 2023, segmented into three distinct periods: pre-COVID-19, during COVID-19, and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. The key contribution of the paper lies in combining a cross-regional perspective with a longer time horizon, covering major shocks. Utilizing the Diebold-Yilmaz interconnectedness index model, we analyze volatilities derived from daily stock prices to identify key players in the transmission and absorption of financial shocks. Our findings, supported by existing literature, reveal a strong interconnectedness between the two parts of Europe. WE banks are more likely to be shock transmitters, while CEE banks play the role of shock receivers. However, during the Russo-Ukrainian war, CEE banks appeared more among the net transmitting banks. Although one of the main features of the CEE financial system is its dependence on WE, a bank nationalism has also emerged in some countries. This may nuance the dynamics of CEE financial stability: reducing the magnitude of WE shock, but in the case of CEE-specific shocks, the possibility of risk transfer (dispersion) is also weakened.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Economics and Management
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2025.25349
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

East-West risk connectedness in the European banking sector

Miléna Dóra Szabó, András Bethlendi
Journal of Business Economics and Management
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

East-West risk connectedness in the European banking sector

Miléna Dóra Szabó, András Bethlendi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the risk spillover dynamics between banks in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Western Europe (WE) across 30 banking groups from 2014 to 2023, segmented into three distinct periods: pre-COVID-19, during COVID-19, and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. The key contribution of the paper lies in combining a cross-regional perspective with a longer time horizon, covering major shocks. Utilizing the Diebold-Yilmaz interconnectedness index model, we analyze volatilities derived from daily stock prices to identify key players in the transmission and absorption of financial shocks. Our findings, supported by existing literature, reveal a strong interconnectedness between the two parts of Europe. WE banks are more likely to be shock transmitters, while CEE banks play the role of shock receivers. However, during the Russo-Ukrainian war, CEE banks appeared more among the net transmitting banks. Although one of the main features of the CEE financial system is its dependence on WE, a bank nationalism has also emerged in some countries. This may nuance the dynamics of CEE financial stability: reducing the magnitude of WE shock, but in the case of CEE-specific shocks, the possibility of risk transfer (dispersion) is also weakened.

Journal of Business Economics and ManagementVol. 26(6)
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.