Lightweight EEG Phase Prediction Based on Channel Attention and Spatio-Temporal Parallel Processing

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Closed-loop phase-locked TMS aims to deliver stimulation at targeted EEG phases, but real-time phase prediction remains a practical bottleneck. Timing errors are especially harmful near peaks and troughs, where small offsets can substantially degrade phase targeting. We benchmark representative predictors and develop models that improve phase consistency while reducing peak/trough lag. <b>Methods:</b> Using the publicly available Monash University TEPs-MEPs dataset, we benchmark classical predictors (AR- and FFT-based) and recurrent baselines (LSTM, GRU). To quantify extremum-specific behavior critical for closed-loop triggering, we propose Mean Lag Time (MLT), defined as the average temporal offset between predicted and ground-truth extrema, alongside PLV, APE, MAE, and RMSE. We further propose a parallel DSC-Attention-GRU architecture combining depthwise separable convolutions for efficient multi-channel spatio-temporal feature extraction with self-attention for spatial reweighting and dependency modeling, followed by a GRU phase predictor. A lightweight SqueezeNet-Attention-GRU variant is also designed for real-time constraints. <b>Results:</b> LSTM/GRU outperform AR/FFT in capturing temporal dynamics but retain residual peak/trough lag. Across stimulation intensities and frequency bands, DSC-Attention-GRU consistently improves phase consistency and prediction accuracy and reduces extremum lag, lowering MLT from ~7.77-7.79 ms to ~7.50-7.56 ms. The lightweight variant maintains stable performance with an average 3.7% inference speedup. <b>Conclusions:</b> Explicitly optimizing extremum timing via MLT and enhancing multi-channel modeling with DSC and attention reduces peak/trough lag and improves phase-consistent prediction, supporting low-latency closed-loop phase-locked TMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010011
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lightweight EEG Phase Prediction Based on Channel Attention and Spatio-Temporal Parallel Processing

Huizhi Liang, Fengda Li, Qianrong Guo, Yuting Yan et al.
Brain Sciences
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Lightweight EEG Phase Prediction Based on Channel Attention and Spatio-Temporal Parallel Processing

Huizhi Liang, Fengda Li, Qianrong Guo, Yuting Yan, Shufei Duan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Closed-loop phase-locked TMS aims to deliver stimulation at targeted EEG phases, but real-time phase prediction remains a practical bottleneck. Timing errors are especially harmful near peaks and troughs, where small offsets can substantially degrade phase targeting. We benchmark representative predictors and develop models that improve phase consistency while reducing peak/trough lag. <b>Methods:</b> Using the publicly available Monash University TEPs-MEPs dataset, we benchmark classical predictors (AR- and FFT-based) and recurrent baselines (LSTM, GRU). To quantify extremum-specific behavior critical for closed-loop triggering, we propose Mean Lag Time (MLT), defined as the average temporal offset between predicted and ground-truth extrema, alongside PLV, APE, MAE, and RMSE. We further propose a parallel DSC-Attention-GRU architecture combining depthwise separable convolutions for efficient multi-channel spatio-temporal feature extraction with self-attention for spatial reweighting and dependency modeling, followed by a GRU phase predictor. A lightweight SqueezeNet-Attention-GRU variant is also designed for real-time constraints. <b>Results:</b> LSTM/GRU outperform AR/FFT in capturing temporal dynamics but retain residual peak/trough lag. Across stimulation intensities and frequency bands, DSC-Attention-GRU consistently improves phase consistency and prediction accuracy and reduces extremum lag, lowering MLT from ~7.77-7.79 ms to ~7.50-7.56 ms. The lightweight variant maintains stable performance with an average 3.7% inference speedup. <b>Conclusions:</b> Explicitly optimizing extremum timing via MLT and enhancing multi-channel modeling with DSC and attention reduces peak/trough lag and improves phase-consistent prediction, supporting low-latency closed-loop phase-locked TMS.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(1)
Jinzhong University (CN), Shanxi Science and Technology Department (CN), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.