Genetic monitoring of a long-term, large-scale experimental steelhead supplementation program
Declining salmonid populations often prompt the use of captive-reared fish to supplement wild stocks, but such programs risk negative genetic and ecological impacts. We evaluated six steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in the Hood Canal watershed, Puget Sound, Washington, including three supplemented and three unsupplemented control populations, over the span of 17 years to assess the effects of supplementation on several population genetics metrics. This program uniquely allowed natural spawning to occur before removing eyed eggs from redds for captive rearing, and later release as smolts or adults. Key genetic metrics-expected heterozygosity, allelic richness, and effective population size-remained stable from before to after supplementation in both the supplemented and non-supplemented populations. Parentage analyses confirmed successful reproduction by captively reared adults after they were released into the wild. These findings suggest that natural spawning prior to captive rearing, among other aspects of the program, lessened the genetic risks typically associated with artificial propagation such as loss of genetic diversity, or a reduction in effective population size. Our results highlight the potential for carefully designed supplementation programs to conserve genetic diversity and maintain effective population sizes in threatened steelhead populations.
Authors
- Andrew M. Claiborne
- Donald M. Van Doornik
- Barry A. Berejikian
Institutions
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-12-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339458
- Primary Topic
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife
- National Marine Fisheries Service