Understanding and rethinking identity through Luhmann’s system theory

Abstract This paper develops a systems-theoretical approach to identity by integrating Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic systems with philosophical insights from Hegel, Frege, Kripke, and Lowe. The central claim is that identity is not a fixed property or metaphysical essence, but an emergent, recursive product of systemic operations such as observation, distinction, condensation, and confirmation. This reconceptualization shifts the focus from static notions of “what something is” to dynamic processes of “how identity is constructed and stabilized.” Luhmann’s position resonates with Lowe’s claim about the primitiveness of numerical identity, while reframing it within a theory of meaning and communication. Applying this framework to personal identity reveals how social systems produce and stabilize identity through paradoxical mechanisms. Rather than resolving contradictions, systems theory treats them as generative, allowing for a nuanced understanding of identity as contingent, constructed, and context-dependent. The implications extend to legal and migration contexts, where systemic operations produce recognizable identity categories with social consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06408-0
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and rethinking identity through Luhmann’s system theory

Murat Sariyar
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Understanding and rethinking identity through Luhmann’s system theory

Murat Sariyar
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops a systems-theoretical approach to identity by integrating Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic systems with philosophical insights from Hegel, Frege, Kripke, and Lowe. The central claim is that identity is not a fixed property or metaphysical essence, but an emergent, recursive product of systemic operations such as observation, distinction, condensation, and confirmation. This reconceptualization shifts the focus from static notions of “what something is” to dynamic processes of “how identity is constructed and stabilized.” Luhmann’s position resonates with Lowe’s claim about the primitiveness of numerical identity, while reframing it within a theory of meaning and communication. Applying this framework to personal identity reveals how social systems produce and stabilize identity through paradoxical mechanisms. Rather than resolving contradictions, systems theory treats them as generative, allowing for a nuanced understanding of identity as contingent, constructed, and context-dependent. The implications extend to legal and migration contexts, where systemic operations produce recognizable identity categories with social consequences.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding and rethinking identity through Luhmann’s system theory — Murat Sariyar · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS