Comparative seismic analysis of G+4 RC Structures with and without floating columns using pushover analysis according to Moroccan seismic code RPS 2011

Floating columns without ground floor extensions—are commonly added in current architectural design for architectural flexibility but may have a significant influence on seismic behavior of structures. This article presents a comparative analysis of three configurations of a typical four-story residential building (G+4): a baseline one with no floating column, the second one with a mid-column floating column, and the third one with an edge-column floating column in cantilever. The computation is carried out under nonlinear static analysis (Pushover) according to the Moroccan Seismic Design Code (RPS 2011). The results determine the effect of floating column position on overall capacity, lateral displacements, plastic hinge formation. The structures with floating columns, especially with cantilever edge configuration, are more susceptible. The study reiterates the importance of having due consideration for floating column position in seismic zones.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000013/pdf
Primary Topic
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative seismic analysis of G+4 RC Structures with and without floating columns using pushover analysis according to Moroccan seismic code RPS 2011

Ayoub Saadaoui, Mouzzoun Mouloud
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
article

Comparative seismic analysis of G+4 RC Structures with and without floating columns using pushover analysis according to Moroccan seismic code RPS 2011

Ayoub Saadaoui, Mouzzoun Mouloud
article en

Abstract

Floating columns without ground floor extensions—are commonly added in current architectural design for architectural flexibility but may have a significant influence on seismic behavior of structures. This article presents a comparative analysis of three configurations of a typical four-story residential building (G+4): a baseline one with no floating column, the second one with a mid-column floating column, and the third one with an edge-column floating column in cantilever. The computation is carried out under nonlinear static analysis (Pushover) according to the Moroccan Seismic Design Code (RPS 2011). The results determine the effect of floating column position on overall capacity, lateral displacements, plastic hinge formation. The structures with floating columns, especially with cantilever edge configuration, are more susceptible. The study reiterates the importance of having due consideration for floating column position in seismic zones.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative seismic analysis of G+4 RC Structures with and without floating columns using pushover analysis according to Moroccan seismic code RPS 2011 — Ayoub Saadaoui, Mouzzoun Mouloud · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS