A fault classification scheme based on protective agents for microgrid with parameters impact analysis

With the increasing use of microgrids, fault identification remains a significant challenge for microgrid protection. Overcurrent protection is the most widely used type of protection in the grids. Also, deep neural networks (DNNs) are used as suitable solutions to improve fault classification accuracy. However, some parameters can affect the performance of the deep learning-based fault detection and location (FDL) schemes. This paper presents a protective agent (PA)-based fault classification method using intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) and hybrid DNNs along with various parameters' impact investigation. First, an FDL scheme based on two types of DNNs (single and hybrid types of layers) and PAs will be presented. Then, we analyze various overcurrent-based protection scenarios and their different parameters' impact on the proposed scheme. In the next stage, the impact of different parameters including adding laterals to the microgrid, adding IEDs to the protection plan, improving the structure of the DNNs, protection scheme structure, and data transfer type on the proposed scheme are investigated in a data analysis and a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. The results demonstrate that the lowest and highest accuracy of the proposed algorithm in the studied scenarios in the fault detection section is 95.54% and 99.96%, in the fault type and phase detection section, is 95.56% and 99.86%, and for the fault location error is 6.51% and 1.27%, respectively. In all scenarios, due to the use of hybrid DNNs with two types of layers, the accuracy of DNN-2 was higher than DNN-1. Also, the results in the sensitivity analysis show that despite the high accuracy of the proposed scheme, some parameters significantly impact the accuracy of the DNNs outputs. We performed simulations using three software: DIgSILENT Power Factory, MATLAB, and Python (with Tensorflow and Keras libraries).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28178-0
Primary Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A fault classification scheme based on protective agents for microgrid with parameters impact analysis

Saman Esmaeilbeigi, Abolfazl Najar, Hossein Kazemi Karegar
Scientific Reports
Power Systems Fault Detection
article

A fault classification scheme based on protective agents for microgrid with parameters impact analysis

Saman Esmaeilbeigi, Abolfazl Najar, Hossein Kazemi Karegar
article en

Abstract

With the increasing use of microgrids, fault identification remains a significant challenge for microgrid protection. Overcurrent protection is the most widely used type of protection in the grids. Also, deep neural networks (DNNs) are used as suitable solutions to improve fault classification accuracy. However, some parameters can affect the performance of the deep learning-based fault detection and location (FDL) schemes. This paper presents a protective agent (PA)-based fault classification method using intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) and hybrid DNNs along with various parameters' impact investigation. First, an FDL scheme based on two types of DNNs (single and hybrid types of layers) and PAs will be presented. Then, we analyze various overcurrent-based protection scenarios and their different parameters' impact on the proposed scheme. In the next stage, the impact of different parameters including adding laterals to the microgrid, adding IEDs to the protection plan, improving the structure of the DNNs, protection scheme structure, and data transfer type on the proposed scheme are investigated in a data analysis and a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. The results demonstrate that the lowest and highest accuracy of the proposed algorithm in the studied scenarios in the fault detection section is 95.54% and 99.96%, in the fault type and phase detection section, is 95.56% and 99.86%, and for the fault location error is 6.51% and 1.27%, respectively. In all scenarios, due to the use of hybrid DNNs with two types of layers, the accuracy of DNN-2 was higher than DNN-1. Also, the results in the sensitivity analysis show that despite the high accuracy of the proposed scheme, some parameters significantly impact the accuracy of the DNNs outputs. We performed simulations using three software: DIgSILENT Power Factory, MATLAB, and Python (with Tensorflow and Keras libraries).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Power Systems Fault Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.