Byzantine Animals

This article has two aims. First, it sketches the Byzantine background in order to highlight its distinctive features. Drawing on examples from Byzantine literature, it highlights both the richness of the sources and the lacunae that remain in their analysis. The phrase “Forgotten Empire” in the title is used with a largely ironic tone; while it draws on a familiar academic cliché, my aim is to highlight the genuinely marginal role that animal studies have historically played in the scholarly narrative on Byzantium. Second, it surveys the current state of Byzantine animal studies. It distinguishes between a “first wave” culminating in the volume Ζώα Και Π∊ριβάλλον Στο βυζάντιο (7ος–12ος Aι.) Animals and Environment in Byzantium (7th–12th Century) and a “second wave” characterized by more-interdisciplinary approaches such as ecocriticism, zoopoetics, and zooarchaeology. Neither discussion is exhaustive, nor is it intended to be. Rather, my aim is to situate Byzantine animals within the broader map of animal studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal History
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/ah.2025.118
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Byzantine Animals

Przemysław Marciniak
Animal History
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Byzantine Animals

Przemysław Marciniak
article en

Abstract

This article has two aims. First, it sketches the Byzantine background in order to highlight its distinctive features. Drawing on examples from Byzantine literature, it highlights both the richness of the sources and the lacunae that remain in their analysis. The phrase “Forgotten Empire” in the title is used with a largely ironic tone; while it draws on a familiar academic cliché, my aim is to highlight the genuinely marginal role that animal studies have historically played in the scholarly narrative on Byzantium. Second, it surveys the current state of Byzantine animal studies. It distinguishes between a “first wave” culminating in the volume Ζώα Και Π∊ριβάλλον Στο βυζάντιο (7ος–12ος Aι.) Animals and Environment in Byzantium (7th–12th Century) and a “second wave” characterized by more-interdisciplinary approaches such as ecocriticism, zoopoetics, and zooarchaeology. Neither discussion is exhaustive, nor is it intended to be. Rather, my aim is to situate Byzantine animals within the broader map of animal studies.

Animal HistoryVol. 2(1)
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.