Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment De-Escalation: From Historical Failures to Contemporary HPV-Driven Paradigms

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) management has shifted following recognition of HPV-driven disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has historically failed to improve overall survival (OS) in mixed head and neck cohorts, although contemporary HPV-stratified series suggest NAC may enable treatment de-escalation. We aimed to narratively synthesize OPSCC-specific evidence on NAC focusing on primary and nodal response, pathologic complete response (pCR), survival, and functional outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a narrative review of PubMed, selecting primary studies in which OPSCC outcomes were reported separately (surgery- or chemoradiotherapy [CRT]-based strategies; HPV status when available). We extracted study design, treatment regimens, response outcomes, survival, and toxicity data. <b>Results</b>: Pre-HPV studies showed variable responses and no consistent OS advantage over locoregional therapy. In the HPV era, non-comparative cohorts of NAC followed by transoral surgery reported substantial downstaging and high pCR rates at both the primary site and regional nodes, with 3-5-year OS frequently ≥80%. NAC+CRT paradigms demonstrated high clinical CR rates and OS exceeding 80-90%, and lower feeding-tube dependence and reduced swallowing morbidity in de-escalated regimens. Comparative retrospective series suggest NAC + surgery may be associated with lower rates of distant metastases and feeding-tube use compared with CRT or upfront surgery, although interpretation is limited by selection bias, regimen heterogeneity, and small sample sizes. <b>Conclusions</b>: While randomized trials have not established an OS advantage for NAC over standard CRT in head and neck cancer overall, HPV-positive OPSCC shows emerging evidence that systemic intensification with NAC may enable surgical and/or radiation de-escalation with promising oncologic and functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010023
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment De-Escalation: From Historical Failures to Contemporary HPV-Driven Paradigms

Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Alvaro Sanabria, Juan P. Rodrigo, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo
Cancers
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment De-Escalation: From Historical Failures to Contemporary HPV-Driven Paradigms

Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Alvaro Sanabria, Juan P. Rodrigo, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) management has shifted following recognition of HPV-driven disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has historically failed to improve overall survival (OS) in mixed head and neck cohorts, although contemporary HPV-stratified series suggest NAC may enable treatment de-escalation. We aimed to narratively synthesize OPSCC-specific evidence on NAC focusing on primary and nodal response, pathologic complete response (pCR), survival, and functional outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a narrative review of PubMed, selecting primary studies in which OPSCC outcomes were reported separately (surgery- or chemoradiotherapy [CRT]-based strategies; HPV status when available). We extracted study design, treatment regimens, response outcomes, survival, and toxicity data. <b>Results</b>: Pre-HPV studies showed variable responses and no consistent OS advantage over locoregional therapy. In the HPV era, non-comparative cohorts of NAC followed by transoral surgery reported substantial downstaging and high pCR rates at both the primary site and regional nodes, with 3-5-year OS frequently ≥80%. NAC+CRT paradigms demonstrated high clinical CR rates and OS exceeding 80-90%, and lower feeding-tube dependence and reduced swallowing morbidity in de-escalated regimens. Comparative retrospective series suggest NAC + surgery may be associated with lower rates of distant metastases and feeding-tube use compared with CRT or upfront surgery, although interpretation is limited by selection bias, regimen heterogeneity, and small sample sizes. <b>Conclusions</b>: While randomized trials have not established an OS advantage for NAC over standard CRT in head and neck cancer overall, HPV-positive OPSCC shows emerging evidence that systemic intensification with NAC may enable surgical and/or radiation de-escalation with promising oncologic and functional outcomes.

CancersVol. 18(1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), AC Camargo Hospital (BR), Hospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación (CO), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.